From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:54:05 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/85xx: standardize display of address map size (32-bit vs. 36-bit) In-Reply-To: <20110901142237.E2D85166C886@gemini.denx.de> References: <1314828916-17931-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <1314828916-17931-2-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20110901142237.E2D85166C886@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4E5F9C8D.3080503@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Wolfgang Denk wrote: > But you are right - I'd much rather see this printed for example as > part of the "bdinfo" command than with the regular boot messages. Recently, we've been adding boards that have CONFIG_PCI_SCAN_SHOW defined. Are you saying that we should not be doing that? That adds a lot more text than my patch does. Examples: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108682/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108533/ Kumar, are you okay with not displaying the address map size at all during boot time? If we bury this information in the 'bdinfo' command, we're going to have even more confusion as to which U-Boot we're booting. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale