From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 2.mo1.mail-out.ovh.net ([178.32.119.250] helo=mo1.mail-out.ovh.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QzX2l-0005XA-AH for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:56:39 +0200 Received: from mail194.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59]) by mo1.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D311100C6D3 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:22:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 2 Sep 2011 09:22:06 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 2 Sep 2011 09:22:05 +0200 Message-ID: <4E60841C.6030002@eukrea.com> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 09:22:04 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.1 (mo1.mail-out.ovh.net) References: <4d660e0531b72769b0bf04e0288cca6d52cb083f.1314892207.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> <49f18160290338d81c35a56f12fb5edaababe78b.1314892207.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> <4E5FD679.1000606@eukrea.com> <20110902071644.GJ3634@jama.jama.net> In-Reply-To: <20110902071644.GJ3634@jama.jama.net> X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 9519765187583192393 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeeftddrudefucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucculddquddttddm Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 4/4] xf86-video-omapfb: add patch for fixing segfault on starting X when using VRFB X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:56:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 02/09/2011 09:16, Martin Jansa a =E9crit : > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:01:13PM +0200, Eric B=E9nard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Le 01/09/2011 17:50, Martin Jansa a =E9crit : >>> From: Sebastian Krzyszkowiak >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa >>> --- >>> .../0004-Attempt-to-fix-VRFB.patch | 320 ++++++++= ++++++++++++ >>> .../xorg-driver/xf86-video-omapfb_git.bb | 3 +- >>> 2 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-video= -omapfb/0004-Attempt-to-fix-VRFB.patch >>> >> why does this driver is inside meta-oe layer instead of the TI layer ? > > mostly because N900 also using xf86-video-omapfb is not built by TI :) > >> btw, as we are starting porting our bsp against meta-oc, is there a do= cument >> describing how the layers are splitted ? >> OK, I was thinking that the ti layer was the base layer for products usin= g TI=20 cpu and not only the layer of products built by TI ;-) Eric