From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de>
Subject: Re: Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 12:52:06 +0200
Message-ID: <4E6206D6.2010709@spth.de>
References: <4E5DD7FA.9000103@spth.de>	<4E61F3D8.4080306@spth.de>
	<CAKMK7uGf4qZ+E87aqX6KaZeksfj-irRA5YL+w8dwcOJHSkpT+g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from smtp2.informatik.uni-freiburg.de
	(mx2.informatik.uni-freiburg.de [132.230.150.5])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCE99E9A9
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sat,  3 Sep 2011 03:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uGf4qZ+E87aqX6KaZeksfj-irRA5YL+w8dwcOJHSkpT+g@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

Am 03.09.2011 12:43, schrieb Daniel Vetter:

> Lately there seem to be a few reports of "my screen doesn't update
> anymore". One thing that seems to (temporary) fix the problem is to
> switch to the kernel console and back to X. Does that help in your
> case?
> 

Yes. Temporary: For a few seconds, then the lower part of the screen
freezes again. Taking a screenshot using import has the same effect.

Philipp


>> This regression was introduced between 3.0 and 3.1rc1.
> 
> If it's a kernel regression, can you please try to bisect it?
> 

I might have a look at it when I find the time to do so.

Philipp