From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailrelay04.sunrise.ch ([194.158.229.47] helo=smtp-be-02.be08.sunrise.ch) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QzuDE-00036f-Si for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 19:41:00 +0200 Received: from [192.168.26.14] (212-98-43-140.static.adslpremium.ch [212.98.43.140]) by smtp-be-02.be08.sunrise.ch (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id p83HaIUh006180; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 19:36:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4E626583.3060302@vollmann.ch> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 19:36:03 +0200 From: Detlef Vollmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1314962732.3526.32.camel@mattotaupa> <1314969543.5939.586.camel@rex> <89FA71E7-9402-4458-BC9E-42655707B091@dominion.thruhere.net> <1314982026.5939.607.camel@rex> In-Reply-To: <1314982026.5939.607.camel@rex> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] Please merge lists openembedded-devel and openembedded-core again. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 17:41:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/02/11 18:47, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 10:53 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:33, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> That sounds like people should just subscribe to oe-core if they want to be aware of changes instead of merging the 2 lists. >> >> Many times changes are related to meta-oe and oe-core and we'd need to >> cross-post and seems wrong. > > I don't think this is actually true and its reasonable to assume > discussion on OE-Core is seen by everyone. Currently, the list descriptions read: "openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Purpose: General discussion & patch submission openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Purpose: Discussions and patches for OE-Core" Given this description I see hardly any post to openembedded-core that shouldn't go to openembedded-devel as well. But cross-posts are bad. I'm not against two separate lists, but it should be clear what should go to which list. If the separation line is such that there are more than 10% cross posts, then the lists should be joined. BTW, some seem to think that openembedded-devel is for OE-Classic, while openembedded-core should be for the new system (i.e. includes oe-core and meta-oe). That might be a better separation line to avoid cross posts, but if that's what people want, this should be clearly said. Another separation line would be the old -devel and -users separation. Personally I could live with clearly separated lists, but I think that just merging everything into openembedded-devel would be the approach that serves all best, as everybody has his own separation line anyway. Detlef