From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932155Ab1IJJbf (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 05:31:35 -0400 Received: from na3sys009aog105.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.75]:54455 "EHLO na3sys009aog105.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751982Ab1IJJbe (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 05:31:34 -0400 Message-ID: <4E6B2E6E.7010807@ti.com> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:01:26 +0530 From: Santosh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, ccross@android.com, rjw@sisk.pl, khilman@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] cpu_pm: Add cpu power management notifiers References: <1315060755-4613-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1315060755-4613-2-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <20110909155632.661f5696.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20110909155632.661f5696.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew, On Saturday 10 September 2011 04:26 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 20:09:11 +0530 > Santosh Shilimkar wrote: [...] > > Have you identified which indivudual you hope/expect to merge this into > mainline? > > The code is presumably and hopefully applicable to architectures other > than ARM, yes? Can you suggest likely candidate architectures so we > can go off and bug the relevant maintainers to review it? > Sorry I missed above question in last email. Am not too sure but any arch which has CPU local timers, interrupt controller, Floating point co-processor etc, should be able to make use of it. So it's applicable to any architecture, but whether they want to use it, i don't know. As you noticed most of the ARM machine's are adapting to it. Along with generic patch, there are couple ARM drivers adapting to make use of it. That was the reason I was pushing this series via Russell's tree. Regards Santosh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:01:26 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] cpu_pm: Add cpu power management notifiers In-Reply-To: <20110909155632.661f5696.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1315060755-4613-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1315060755-4613-2-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <20110909155632.661f5696.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: <4E6B2E6E.7010807@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Andrew, On Saturday 10 September 2011 04:26 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 20:09:11 +0530 > Santosh Shilimkar wrote: [...] > > Have you identified which indivudual you hope/expect to merge this into > mainline? > > The code is presumably and hopefully applicable to architectures other > than ARM, yes? Can you suggest likely candidate architectures so we > can go off and bug the relevant maintainers to review it? > Sorry I missed above question in last email. Am not too sure but any arch which has CPU local timers, interrupt controller, Floating point co-processor etc, should be able to make use of it. So it's applicable to any architecture, but whether they want to use it, i don't know. As you noticed most of the ARM machine's are adapting to it. Along with generic patch, there are couple ARM drivers adapting to make use of it. That was the reason I was pushing this series via Russell's tree. Regards Santosh