From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54421)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1R31SB-0001W8-Tr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:01:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1R31SA-0007QQ-Ow
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:01:19 -0400
Received: from mail-vx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]:38996)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1R31SA-0007QI-Mf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:01:18 -0400
Received: by vxj15 with SMTP id 15so2442685vxj.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 01:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4E6DBC4E.5030904@twiddle.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:01:18 +0100
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAu8pHt+xLrX8pe6j7ebkw+tiDs8z4oek1E-BqBLT2GCa4=XDA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E6DA603.7090309@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E6DA603.7090309@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] Sparc AREG0 conversion
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 09/12/2011 07:26 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/11/2011 03:29 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> After this patch set, only load and store op helpers remain in
>> op_helper.c. I have some patches for those but they need more thought.
> 
> Have you benchmarked it?

Asking for a benchmark without full conversion is pointless.


r~