[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] ARM: Update mach-types

[Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>]

On 09/12/2011 04:20 PM, Holger Brunck wrote:
> On 09/12/2011 04:14 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> No, but then the respective maintainers will get a warning and will be forced to 
>>>>> fix their boards in both linux and uboot.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the simplest way to catch these boards (if any) is to run MAKEALL
>>>> on arm targets with your mach-types file. If no board is broken, we have
>>>> not to worry about.
>>>>
>>>
>>> sorry, I didn't follow the whole discussion, but this patch will remove the
>>> mach type for our km_kirkwood board.
>>>
>>> -#define MACH_TYPE_KM_KIRKWOOD          2255
>>>
>>> This board is supported in u-boot but not mainlined in linux. So how should we
>>> handle this?
>>
>> Well, I think we cannot check for each update of this file which board
>> are dropped - this requires too much effort. The way we currently use
>> (Linux is the master of this file, and we update it directly from the
>> kernel) is IMHO the right way to get it in sync.
>>
> 
> Yes I agree. And I think our KM_KIRKWOOD may be a special case, because in the
> past we were present in mainline mach-types, but during a cleanup we were
> dropped, because we missed to get the associated board mainlined.
> 
>> Maybe the best way, if you want to have your board maintained in u-boot
>> but not in kernel (however, why ?) is to define your MACH in the board
>> configuration file.
>>

Just a short explanation on this strange situation where we have board supported
in u-boot but not in the mainline kernel. We wanted to have our board supported
in the mainline kernel, but with the current Linux arm-consolidation effort
where the goal is to have device tree taking care of board support, this is not
possible at the moment (patches would be rejected or we would have to redo this
work later).

We are waiting for device tree support for kirkwood (which is not currently
available, I am not even sure this will eventually come, maybe we'll do it on
our own) to make a mainline effort for km_kirkwood. During this timespan
KM_KIRKWOOD got cleaned up from mach-types.

Valentin Longchamp