All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rpm: add multilib prefix for archs under deploy/rpm
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:34:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E70BB90.9000109@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D5AB6E638E5A3E4B8F4406B113A5A19A12D81DF1C1@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On 9/13/11 9:56 PM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org
>> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
>> Mark Hatle
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:24 PM
>> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] rpm: add multilib prefix for archs under
>> deploy/rpm
>>
>> On 9/12/11 9:39 PM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org
>>>> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
>>>> Of Mark Hatle
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 1:23 AM
>>>> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] rpm: add multilib prefix for archs
>>>> under deploy/rpm
>>>>
>>>> On 9/12/11 10:07 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org
>>>>>> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On
>> Behalf
>>>>>> Of Mark Hatle
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:56 PM
>>>>>> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] rpm: add multilib prefix for
>>>>>> archs under deploy/rpm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/12/11 3:34 AM, Dongxiao Xu wrote:
>>>>>>> Currently MACHINE_ARCH deploy folder is unique in multilib system,
>>>>>>> thus a lib32 version of rpm package will override a normal rpm
>>>>>>> package if its PACKAGE_ARCH is ${MACHINE_ARCH}.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Define different deploy folder for multilib architectures to avoid
>>>>>>> the confliction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure I understand here.  Within the deployment directory is
>>>>>> a set of directories for each RPM architecture.  Are you saying
>>>>>> that we can get two packages that have different contents but the
>>>>>> same RPM
>>>> architecture?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, for example the netbase recipe, which the PACKAGE_ARCH =
>>>> MACHINE_ARCH.
>>>>> Both the normal version of netbase package and the lib32 version are
>>>>> named as "netbase-4.45-r1.qemux86_64.rpm" putting in
>>>>> tmp/deploy/rpm/qemux86-64 directory, so we need to differentiate them.
>>>>
>>>> Wow, that is very broken.  I think part of the problem is that the
>>>> arch is used to signify not only ABI (and optimizations), but also machine
>> type in this case.
>>>>
>>>> What we really need is an additional architecture type that handles
>>>> machine specific packages for each multilib type.  I'm really not
>>>> sure what they would be called or how it would work though.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone have suggestions for naming and processing of these?  (I'm
>>>> almost tempted to say "machine_lib")
>>>
>>> In the weekend I had a talk with Richard and he suggested on adding
>> MLPREFIX to MACHINE_ARCH to differentiate them.
>>> Otherwise user need to define a new value for
>> MACHINE_virtclass-multilib-lib32?
>>
>> I can't think of a better solution for this right now.  Note, that if the MLPREFIX
>> is added to the MACHINE_ARCH, a corresponding change to Zypper will be
>> needed as well.
> 
> I tried this approach by defining 'MACHINE_virtclass-multilib-lib32="qemux86"' in local.conf, and it works. Therefore we will have qemux86, qemux86-64, x86, x86-64, and all architectures under tmp/deploy/rpm folder. 
> 
> Does zypper work with this approach?

This should work, we just need to ensure that zypper/libzypp are paying
attention to the MACHINE... type(s) as well.  There is a small chunk of code
within the libzypp recipe that generates a table of available/compatible
architectures.  This is what will need to be updated.

(I do think the MACHINE_virtclass change you made is likely the best approach
right now.)

--Mark

> Thanks,
> Dongxiao
> 
>>
>> --Mark
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dongxiao
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --Mark
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Dongxiao
>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you give me an example of what is going wrong?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Mark
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  meta/classes/multilib.bbclass   |    5 +++++
>>>>>>>  meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass |    4 +++-
>>>>>>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/multilib.bbclass
>>>>>>> b/meta/classes/multilib.bbclass index 76c86b2..6ace1fe 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/meta/classes/multilib.bbclass
>>>>>>> +++ b/meta/classes/multilib.bbclass
>>>>>>> @@ -77,4 +77,9 @@ python __anonymous () {
>>>>>>>      multilib_map_variable("PACKAGES_DYNAMIC", variant, d)
>>>>>>>      multilib_map_variable("PACKAGE_INSTALL", variant, d)
>>>>>>>      multilib_map_variable("INITSCRIPT_PACKAGES", variant, d)
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +    package_arch = d.getVar("PACKAGE_ARCH", True)
>>>>>>> +    machine_arch = d.getVar("MACHINE_ARCH", True)
>>>>>>> +    if package_arch == machine_arch:
>>>>>>> +        d.setVar("PACKAGE_ARCH", variant + "_" + package_arch)
>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass
>>>>>>> b/meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass index 135ca75..7936d77 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass
>>>>>>> +++ b/meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass
>>>>>>> @@ -218,7 +218,9 @@ python () {
>>>>>>>              default_tune =
>>>>>> localdata.getVar("DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-" + eext[1],
>>>>>> False)
>>>>>>>              if default_tune:
>>>>>>>                  localdata.setVar("DEFAULTTUNE", default_tune)
>>>>>>> -            ml_package_archs +=
>> localdata.getVar("PACKAGE_ARCHS",
>>>>>> True) or ""
>>>>>>> +            localdata.setVar("MACHINE_ARCH", eext[1] + "_" +
>>>>>> localdata.getVar("MACHINE_ARCH", False))
>>>>>>> +            package_archs = localdata.getVar("PACKAGE_ARCHS",
>>>> True)
>>>>>> or ""
>>>>>>> +            ml_package_archs += " " + package_archs
>>>>>>>              #bb.note("ML_PACKAGE_ARCHS %s %s %s" % (eext[1],
>>>>>> localdata.getVar("PACKAGE_ARCHS", True) or "(none)", overrides))
>>>>>>>      bb.data.setVar('MULTILIB_PACKAGE_ARCHS',
>> ml_package_archs,
>>>>>> d)  }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-co
>>>>>> re
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-cor
>>>>> e
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core




  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-14 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-12  8:33 [PATCH 0/3][RFC] rpm: multilib related fixes Dongxiao Xu
2011-09-12  8:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] package_rpm: add architecture info in rpm spec file Dongxiao Xu
2011-09-12 14:51   ` Mark Hatle
2011-09-13  2:24     ` Xu, Dongxiao
2011-09-13 15:29       ` Mark Hatle
2011-09-13 15:41         ` Xu, Dongxiao
2011-09-13 15:58           ` Mark Hatle
2011-09-14  1:03             ` Xu, Dongxiao
2011-09-14 14:33               ` Mark Hatle
2011-09-12  8:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] rpm: add multilib prefix for archs under deploy/rpm Dongxiao Xu
2011-09-12 14:55   ` Mark Hatle
2011-09-12 15:07     ` Xu, Dongxiao
2011-09-12 17:22       ` Mark Hatle
2011-09-13  2:39         ` Xu, Dongxiao
2011-09-13 15:24           ` Mark Hatle
2011-09-14  2:56             ` Xu, Dongxiao
2011-09-14 14:34               ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2011-09-12  8:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] multilib: install MULTILIB_PACKAGE_INSTALL Dongxiao Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E70BB90.9000109@windriver.com \
    --to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=dongxiao.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.