On 2011-09-15 14:05, Roy Tam wrote: > Here you go. > > sb16: warning: command 0xf,1 is not truly understood yet > sb16: warning: command 0xe,2 is not truly understood yet > [Switching to Thread 13840.0x3140] > > Breakpoint 1, arp_table_search (slirp=0x19f7380, ip_addr=4294967295, > out_ethaddr=0x20af64a "") at slirp/arp_table.c:75 > 75 // assert((ip_addr & htonl(~(0xf << 28))) != 0); > (gdb) c > Continuing. > [New Thread 13840.0x31b8] > [Switching to Thread 13840.0x3628] > > Breakpoint 1, arp_table_search (slirp=0x19f7380, ip_addr=0, > out_ethaddr=0x22f642 "\"") at slirp/arp_table.c:75 > 75 // assert((ip_addr & htonl(~(0xf << 28))) != 0); > (gdb) bt > #0 arp_table_search (slirp=0x19f7380, ip_addr=0, out_ethaddr=0x22f642 "\"") > at slirp/arp_table.c:75 > #1 0x004bafbd in if_encap (slirp=0x19f7488, ifm=0x2255978) > at slirp/slirp.c:709 > #2 0x004b8a73 in if_start (slirp=0x19f7380) at slirp/if.c:210 > #3 0x004b9c9e in ip_output (so=0x2255978, m0=0x0) at slirp/ip_output.c:84 > #4 0x004bf737 in tcp_output (tp=0x1cac848) at slirp/tcp_output.c:456 > #5 0x004c09ad in tcp_drop (tp=0x1cac848, err=0) at slirp/tcp_subr.c:225 > #6 0x004c1182 in tcp_timers (timer=, tp=) > at slirp/tcp_timer.c:287 > #7 tcp_slowtimo (slirp=0x0) at slirp/tcp_timer.c:88 > #8 0x004bb6f1 in slirp_select_poll (readfds=0x22fae0, writefds=0x22f9dc, > xfds=0x22f8d8, select_error=2291816) at slirp/slirp.c:433 > #9 0x0048fb87 in main_loop_wait (nonblocking=0) > at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:1436 > #10 0x00490d10 in main_loop () at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:1466 > #11 qemu_main (argc=0, argv=0x19f5100, envp=0x0) > at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:3453 > #12 0x0049322d in SDL_main (argc=17, argv=0x19f5100) > at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:102 > #13 0x005eb784 in console_main () > #14 0x005eb844 in WinMain@16 () > #15 0x005eb068 in main () > (gdb) frame 4 > #4 0x004bf737 in tcp_output (tp=0x1cac848) at slirp/tcp_output.c:456 > 456 error = ip_output(so, m); > (gdb) print *tp > $1 = {seg_next = 0x1cac848, seg_prev = 0x1cac848, t_state = 0, t_timer = {0, > 0, 0, 0}, t_rxtshift = 0, t_rxtcur = 12, t_dupacks = 0, t_maxseg = 1460, > t_force = 0 '\000', t_flags = 0, t_template = {ti_i = {ih_mbuf = { > mptr = 0x0, dummy = 0}, ih_x1 = 0 '\000', ih_pr = 0 '\000', > ih_len = 0, ih_src = {S_un = {S_un_b = {s_b1 = 0 '\000', > s_b2 = 0 '\000', s_b3 = 0 '\000', s_b4 = 0 '\000'}, S_un_w = { > s_w1 = 0, s_w2 = 0}, S_addr = 0}}, ih_dst = {S_un = {S_un_b = { > s_b1 = 0 '\000', s_b2 = 0 '\000', s_b3 = 0 '\000', > s_b4 = 0 '\000'}, S_un_w = {s_w1 = 0, s_w2 = 0}, S_addr = 0}}}, That confirms my theory: the template is not yet initialized. A shot from the hips: does this patch help? diff --git a/slirp/tcp_input.c b/slirp/tcp_input.c index c1214c0..5a79c68 100644 --- a/slirp/tcp_input.c +++ b/slirp/tcp_input.c @@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ findso: so->so_ti = ti; tp->t_timer[TCPT_KEEP] = TCPTV_KEEP_INIT; tp->t_state = TCPS_SYN_RECEIVED; + tcp_template(tp); } return; Jan