From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756800Ab1ISQtm (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:49:42 -0400 Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.22.20]:51135 "HELO oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755013Ab1ISQtl (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:49:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4E7772A2.8010000@xenotime.net> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:49:38 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap Organization: YPO4 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110907 SUSE/3.1.14 Thunderbird/3.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Baron CC: Greg KH , Arnd Bergmann , gregkh@suse.de, joe@perches.com, jim.cromie@gmail.com, bvanassche@acm.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH ] dynamic_debug: call __netdev_printk only for CONFIG_NET References: <5514795fe63ccfd4b3a80283ed04a526abe3c59d.1313085588.git.jbaron@redhat.com> <201109011657.02407.arnd@arndb.de> <20110901151817.GA14324@redhat.com> <20110918082736.GB19444@kroah.com> <20110919134814.GA2658@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110919134814.GA2658@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1807:box742.bluehost.com:xenotime:xenotime.net} {sentby:smtp auth 50.53.38.135 authed with rdunlap@xenotime.net} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/19/2011 06:48 AM, Jason Baron wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:27:36AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:18:18AM -0400, Jason Baron wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>> __netdev_printk is only defined when CONFIG_NET is set. Since we only need >>>> __dynamic_netdev_dbg for network drivers, we can make it conditional on the >>>> same Kconfig symbol. >>>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Yes, I've posted a fix for this: >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/30/297 >>> >>> Hopefully, it will be pulled in soon. >> >> As that thread again spun off into confusion, can you please resend the >> end result? >> >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h > > Hi, > > Andrew Morton has pulled these into his -mm tree...so I think the series > should be all set. Good. The build fix is still needed in today's linux-next (20110919). -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***