From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.neratec.ch ([80.75.119.105]:35267 "EHLO mail.neratec.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755692Ab1JCMXc (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:23:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4E89A941.8060208@neratec.com> (sfid-20111003_142335_616859_8420DCF7) Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:23:29 +0200 From: Zefir Kurtisi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com, rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com, nbd@openwrt.org Subject: Re: [RFC 3/6] ath9k: initial radar pulse detection for DFS References: <1317637758-11907-1-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> <1317637758-11907-4-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/03/2011 01:57 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Just out of curiousity, is there any "fast clock" on or off with the AR93xx ? > > (That's one of the gotchas I came across when porting DFS code to > FreeBSD for the AR9160/AR9280.) > > Thanks, > > > Adrian There might be one, but I left it out (for now) for the sake of simplicity. I anyhow doubt it has a practical relevance, since the pulse width is reported with usec granularity and therefore a scaling factor of 1/811 vs. 1/800 has no impact on the re-scaled value for widths up to 50 usecs. Zefir From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zefir Kurtisi Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:23:29 +0200 Subject: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 3/6] ath9k: initial radar pulse detection for DFS In-Reply-To: References: <1317637758-11907-1-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> <1317637758-11907-4-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> Message-ID: <4E89A941.8060208@neratec.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On 10/03/2011 01:57 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Just out of curiousity, is there any "fast clock" on or off with the AR93xx ? > > (That's one of the gotchas I came across when porting DFS code to > FreeBSD for the AR9160/AR9280.) > > Thanks, > > > Adrian There might be one, but I left it out (for now) for the sake of simplicity. I anyhow doubt it has a practical relevance, since the pulse width is reported with usec granularity and therefore a scaling factor of 1/811 vs. 1/800 has no impact on the re-scaled value for widths up to 50 usecs. Zefir