From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RB8ND-0001p4-GI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RB8NC-0001bT-BL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27205) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RB8NC-0001bG-4R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:42 -0400 Message-ID: <4E8B3BEC.10101@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:01:32 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1317739882-4809-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <4E8B1F0D.4080203@redhat.com> <4E8B1FBC.2080904@codemonkey.ws> <1317746028.2552.191.camel@bling.home> In-Reply-To: <1317746028.2552.191.camel@bling.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V1 00/11] Xen PCI Passthrough List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Williamson Cc: Anthony Perard , Xen Devel , QEMU-devel , Stefano Stabellini On 10/04/2011 06:33 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > I thought we were potentially looking at vfio as a convergence point. > I'm still a bit off from having a vfio re-write ready to submit, but is > this still a possibility? Thanks, > vfio leaves out users of current and past kernels; relying on it would force me to maintain qemu-kvm for a while. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V1 00/11] Xen PCI Passthrough Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:01:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4E8B3BEC.10101@redhat.com> References: <1317739882-4809-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <4E8B1F0D.4080203@redhat.com> <4E8B1FBC.2080904@codemonkey.ws> <1317746028.2552.191.camel@bling.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1317746028.2552.191.camel@bling.home> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org To: Alex Williamson Cc: Anthony Perard , Xen Devel , QEMU-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/04/2011 06:33 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > I thought we were potentially looking at vfio as a convergence point. > I'm still a bit off from having a vfio re-write ready to submit, but is > this still a possibility? Thanks, > vfio leaves out users of current and past kernels; relying on it would force me to maintain qemu-kvm for a while. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function