On 03/10/2011 20:09, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:45:36PM +0100, Anthony Wright wrote: >> On 01/10/2011 13:07, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:07:06PM +0100, Anthony Wright wrote: >>>> I have a machine with 16GB of RAM running 32 bit xen 4.1.1 with Dom0 >>>> running a 3.0.4 linux kernel and 23 paravirtualized DomUs. >>>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> Why 32bit Xen? I think all (most?) hypervisor testing happens with 64bit Xen. >>> Note that you can still have 32bit dom0 kernel with 64b hypervisor. >> I'm going to investigate 64 bit xen on a 32 bit Dom0 soon, but as to the >> 32 xen, I work quite a lot with older hardware and Xen since it does >> paravirtualisation, and it's a really good way to re-use old hardware. >>>> As the free ram gets to 2391 MB free the system behaves as if it's got >>>> no more ram, and starts grabbing ram from Dom0, before getting even more >>>> confused and failing to start DomUs and eventually crashing the whole >>>> machine. I have attached a tarball with the output of xl dmesg, xl info >>>> & xl list at various points. >>>> >>> - Do you use dom0_mem= parameter for Xen? >>> - Did you disable dom0 ballooning? >>> >>> http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/XenBestPractices >> I was already using the dom0_mem= parameter on the xen hypervisor, but I >> disabled dom0 ballooning (enable-dom0-ballooning no), and just for good >> measure I also set (dom0-min-mem 2000). This had no effect, when I >> increase the 10-4 memory requirements, on restart the Dom0 memory is >> reduced to 1713MB and xl info reports 2391MB free. >>>> Stage 1 >>>> Everything is fine, Dom0 has 2000MB according to xl list, and 'xl info' >>>> says there is 2405MB free. >>> - How much memory did dom0 initially have? >>> - Did you use mem= parameter for dom0 kernel (vmlinuz) ? >>> >>> See: http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/Linux_30_bugs >> dom0 starts with 2000MB. >> I didn't use mem= on the linux kernel - I thought it wasn't neccessary. > It is if your kernel does not have these two patches: > > xen: use maximum reservation to limit amount of usable RAM > xen/e820: if there is no dom0_mem=, don't tweak extra_pages. > > .. oh and you also need to update the hypervisor to include: > " > For dom0, this requires at patch to Xen ('x86: use 'dom0_mem' to limit > the number of pages for dom0') (c/s 23790) > " > > Grrr.. Let me update the 3.0 bug-list >From reading around some of the bug reports, I thought this was a problem caused by the fact that I have 16GB of ram. As a result I reduced the amount of physical ram in the machine down to 8GB, but still got the same effect (with the two kernel patches, but not with the xen patch as I can't find it). I've attached a log of xl info & xl list as the domU that trips the machine up is started (10-5). Dom0 is supposed to have 700MB of ram (dom0_mem=500M), dom0-min-mem is 700 and enable-dom0-ballooning is no.