All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Parnell <mparnell@gmail.com>
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug In ext4 in kernels > 2.6.39 - Not mounting with arguments/options I specify in fstab on root remount
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 21:32:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB76D65.7070509@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EB76C21.5060104@gmail.com>

On 11/06/2011 09:26 PM, Matt Parnell wrote:
> On 11/06/2011 06:24 PM, Matt Parnell wrote:
>> On 10/22/2011 02:32 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 02:51:35AM -0500, Matt Parnell wrote:
>>>> That doesn't really help me at all, it's not
>>>> rootflags=data=writeback causing this, it's starting to make me
>>>> think that arch's init may be to blame, although I previously ruled
>>>> it out...
>>> Well, it looks like rootflags=data=writeback is not making it to the
>>> file system.  That's why it's not showing up in /proc/mounts, from you
>>> showed us.  Can you look at the kernel dmesg?
>>>
>>> You should see something like this:
>>>
>>> [    1.421146] EXT3-fs (vda): error: couldn't mount because of 
>>> unsupported optional features (240)
>>> [    1.434057] EXT4-fs (vda): couldn't mount as ext2 due to feature 
>>> incompatibilities
>>> [    1.454631] EXT4-fs (vda): mounted filesystem with writeback data 
>>> mode. Opts: data=writeback
>>> [    1.455966] VFS: Mounted root (ext4 filesystem) readonly on 
>>> device 254:0.
>>>
>>>
>>> The first line is the failure to mount the root file system as ext3.
>>> The 2nd is the failure to mount the file system as ext2, using the
>>> ext4 file system driver.  The last two lines show the options show the
>>> mount as ext4.
>>>
>>> What do those two lines look to you.  If you don't see "Opts:
>>> data=writeback", then somehow the rootflags option isn't getting passed
>>> down to the file system.  Then when you try to remount the file system
>>> read/write, the fact that you have "data=writeback" in your /etc/fstab
>>> causes the failure to remount.
>>>
>>> If you simply remove that from /etc/fstab, things should work better.
>>> The remount will preserve whatever data=journalling mode was in use
>>> when the root file system was originallymounted as.  If rootflags is
>>> non-functional, then the file system won't be mounted as
>>> data=writeback, but at least the boot sequence will continue without
>>> blowing out.
>>>
>>>                             - Ted
>> Looks like the kernel isn't creating the /dev/root link/block device, 
>> either all of the time or some of the time, I'm confused.
> I figured it out. data=writeback isn't needed and is done by default 
> if there's no journal, as per commit 
> 373cd5c53d5ea6622c319ecd84e29e2737d488bd 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=373cd5c53d5ea6622c319ecd84e29e2737d488bd
>
> ...sorry about throwing you guys through loops over this, although I'm 
> guessing there's still a bug in that the kernel should just warn the 
> user about the option when it's used and otherwise ignore it instead 
> of breaking if there's no journal.
That is, you were right in removing rootflags=data=writeback from the 
kernel boot params, and removing data=writeback from fstab would fix it 
- that commit is where things break, though...

So really instead of breaking it should log that it's ignoring that flag 
becuase it's enabled by default when there's no journal.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-07  3:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4E6F1B49.3010803@gmail.com>
2011-09-13  9:01 ` Bug In ext4 in kernels > 2.6.39 - Not mounting with arguments/options I specify in fstab on root remount Matt Parnell
2011-09-13 10:25   ` Christian Kujau
     [not found]     ` <CABeR261eWW1vi1Xk9E6SWdy7PN=oiDbQdT_LiHgZf7+6V7Sv8Q@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-13 10:48       ` Christian Kujau
2011-09-13 14:49   ` Eric Sandeen
2011-10-09 22:10     ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-09 23:44       ` Ted Ts'o
2011-10-21  3:29         ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-21  4:29           ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-22  5:00           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-10-22  7:51             ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-22  7:53               ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-22  9:32               ` Ted Ts'o
2011-11-07  2:18                 ` Matt Parnell
2011-11-07  2:24                 ` Matt Parnell
2011-11-07  5:26                   ` Matt Parnell
2011-11-07  5:32                     ` Matt Parnell [this message]
2011-11-07 15:47                     ` Ted Ts'o
2011-11-08  1:48                       ` Matt Parnell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EB76D65.7070509@gmail.com \
    --to=mparnell@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.