From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ey0-f176.google.com (mail-ey0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BE0E006DF for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:42:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by eaac13 with SMTP id c13so2545678eaa.35 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:42:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.3.222 with SMTP id 70mr1855859eeh.11.1323729746530; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:42:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([79.117.116.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q28sm80890207eea.6.2011.12.12.14.42.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:42:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EE68351.5090600@gherzan.ro> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:42:25 +0200 From: Andrei Gherzan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: poky@yoctoproject.org References: <4EE4D5FA.3050604@gherzan.ro> <1323641532.2731.5.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: gnutls-2.12.14-r3.1 - strange rpm names yocto X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:42:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I went into code a little. The problem is, as i see, that this gnutls package is included in LGPLv2_WHITELIST_GPLv3. This is why this package is not checked for LICENSE and is passed further. In base.class - line 399: if pn not in hosttools_whitelist and pn not in lgplv2_whitelist and pn not in dont_want_whitelist: So as you can see here is checked every package. This variable, LGPLv2_WHITELIST_GPLv3, is defined in default-distrovars.inc as: LGPLv2_WHITELIST_GPLv3 ?= "libassuan gnutls libtasn1 libidn libgcc gcc-runtime" So the problem goes like this: Why isn't this list "LGPLv2_WHITELIST_GPLv3" checked and part of it ends up in rootfs final archive (if is dependency for a package - take connman as example) even if these packages are GPLv3? Can anybody explain me this VARIABLE and the story that comes along?