From: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] pango: clarify LICENSE is LGPL-2.0+
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:08:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEFB5E1.7040204@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B87129-E8A1-4358-BA5A-7090EA679925@dominion.thruhere.net>
On 15/12/11 23:30, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 16 dec. 2011, om 00:30 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc b/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc
>> index ff5a73a..922425c 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ core of text and font handling for GTK+-2.x."
>> HOMEPAGE = "http://www.pango.org/"
>> BUGTRACKER = "http://bugzilla.gnome.org"
>> SECTION = "libs"
>> -LICENSE = "LGPL"
>> +LICENSE = "LGPL-2.0+"
>
> In the past we agreed to use LGLPv2+ for that, has that changed?
My bad, I saw the modified license handling code was mapping to SPDX
values and opted to just do that. You're right though, current
convention is the v notation.
I've respun the patch series.
Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-19 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-15 23:30 [PATCH 00/10] Various license clarifications Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] gypsy: fix LICENSE field Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 02/10] udev: fix LICENSE fields to be SPDX compliant Joshua Lock
2011-12-16 7:36 ` Khem Raj
2011-12-19 18:48 ` Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] apt: clarify LICENSE as GPL-2.0 Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 04/10] dpkg: " Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 05/10] clutter: clarify LICENSE as LGPL-2.1 Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] cogl: clarify LICENSE as LGPL-2.1 and fix metadata Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] matchbox-wm: clarify LICENSE as GPL-2.0 Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] pango: clarify LICENSE is LGPL-2.0+ Joshua Lock
2011-12-16 7:30 ` Koen Kooi
2011-12-19 22:08 ` Joshua Lock [this message]
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] matchbox-desktop: clarify LICENSE is GPL-2.0+ Joshua Lock
2011-12-15 23:30 ` [PATCH 10/10] matchbox-session-sato: clarify LICENSE in GPL-2.0 Joshua Lock
2011-12-21 17:18 ` [PATCH 00/10] Various license clarifications Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EEFB5E1.7040204@linux.intel.com \
--to=josh@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.