From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46835) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdRz9-0000ct-Vr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:37:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdRz8-00065N-Td for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:37:55 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]:50887) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdRz8-00065A-Qa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:37:54 -0500 Received: by iagj37 with SMTP id j37so13953313iag.4 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:37:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EF2358D.7050503@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:37:49 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1323185272-2610-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4EE9CA34.9060805@redhat.com> <4EE9D569.5090603@redhat.com> <4EF22153.8010202@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4EF22153.8010202@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/25] nbd asynchronous operation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, MORITA Kazutaka , Nicholas Thomas On 12/21/2011 12:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 12/15/2011 12:09 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> > This needs rebasing due to commit 3a93113 (fix typo: delete redundant >>> > semicolon, 2011-11-29). To avoid further spamming, I placed the whole >>> > thing at git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git in branch nbd-server. >> I won't get to this (and virtio-scsi) before I go on vacation next week, >> and probably for some time after it. Feel free to send a pull request to >> Anthony when you think the series have received enough review and are >> tested well enough. >> >> Maybe Nick is interested in reviewing this series, CCed him. > > Anthony, I think this is tested well enough (by me :) but it hasn't received > review and likely won't. Does that mean we need a: Network Block Device M: Paolo Bonzini S: Maintained F: block/block-nbd.c F: nbd.* F: qemu-nbd.c In MAINTAINERS? Please send a patch if you're willing. If that's fine with you, it's pushed at > git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git in branch nbd-server. Please send a proper pull request. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > The sheepdog bits are quite old and have been reviewed by Kazutaka. > > Paolo