From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Guy Watkins" Subject: RE: Linux Raid performance Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:24:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4F42B9A76007451DA63A90BA27FEFBDC@m5> References: <20100402110506.GA16294@rap.rap.dk> <4BB69670.3040303@sauce.co.nz> <4BB7856C.30808@shiftmail.org> <4BB79D76.7090206@sauce.co.nz> <4BB8A979.3020502@shiftmail.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Mark Knecht' , 'Learner Study' Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids } -----Original Message----- } From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-raid- } owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mark Knecht } Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 2:47 PM } To: Learner Study } Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org } Subject: Re: Linux Raid performance } } On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Learner Study } wrote: } > Happy Easter!!! } > } > So, 550-600MB/s is the best we have seen with Linux raid using 16-24 SAS } drives. } > } > Not sure if its appropriate to ask on this list - has someone seen } > better numbers with non-linux raid stack? Perhaps freebsd/lustre.. } > } > Thanks for your time! } > } } Are you just trolling or something? Why are you asking about non-linux } RAID on a Linux software RAID list? } } I cannot believe the name Learner Study is real, is it? Possibly it } would make sense to first study, and from that hopefully learn, and } then come ask some questions with some depth to them? } } - Mark This seemed like a fair question to me. I just wonder why Winblows was left out. After all, if any OS, including Winblows can outperform Linux, we should know about it. Maybe you are afraid the other operating systems out perform Linux?