All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	luto@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: migrate: fix barriers around tlb_flush_pending
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:40:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F474FD8-82BE-4881-AE47-40AA6A4091C1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170728074256.7xsnoldtfuh7ywir@suse.de>

Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 04:40:15AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> Reading tlb_flush_pending while the page-table lock is taken does not
>> require a barrier, since the lock/unlock already acts as a barrier.
>> Removing the barrier in mm_tlb_flush_pending() to address this issue.
>> 
>> However, migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() calls mm_tlb_flush_pending()
>> while the page-table lock is already released, which may present a
>> problem on architectures with weak memory model (PPC). To deal with this
>> case, a new parameter is added to mm_tlb_flush_pending() to indicate
>> if it is read without the page-table lock taken, and calling
>> smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() in this case.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
> 
> Conditional locking based on function arguements are often considered
> extremely hazardous. Conditional barriers are even more troublesome because
> it's simply too easy to get wrong.
> 
> Revert b0943d61b8fa420180f92f64ef67662b4f6cc493 instead of this patch. It's
> not a clean revert but conflicts are due to comment changes. It moves
> the check back under the PTL and the impact is marginal given that
> it a spurious TLB flush will only occur when potentially racing with
> change_prot_range. Since that commit went in, a lot of changes have happened
> that alter the scan rate of automatic NUMA balancing so it shouldn't be a
> serious issue. It's certainly a nicer option than using conditional barriers.

Ok. Initially, I added a memory barrier only in
migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(), and included a detailed comment about it
- I still think it is better. But since you feel confident the impact will
be relatively small, I will do the revert.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2017-07-28 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-27 11:40 [PATCH v3 0/2] mm: fixes of tlb_flush_pending races Nadav Amit
2017-07-27 11:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: migrate: prevent racy access to tlb_flush_pending Nadav Amit
2017-07-27 11:40   ` Nadav Amit
2017-07-28  1:34   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-07-28  1:44     ` Nadav Amit
2017-07-28  1:42   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-07-28  2:28   ` Rik van Riel
2017-07-27 11:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: migrate: fix barriers around tlb_flush_pending Nadav Amit
2017-07-28  7:42   ` Mel Gorman
2017-07-28 16:40     ` Nadav Amit [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F474FD8-82BE-4881-AE47-40AA6A4091C1@gmail.com \
    --to=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.