From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S22Bi-0005Xs-QU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:08:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S22Bd-0004ry-Ea for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:08:30 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S22Bd-0004ro-66 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:08:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4B9C64.9040105@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:08:20 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1329930815-7995-1-git-send-email-fsimonce@redhat.com> <1329930815-7995-2-git-send-email-fsimonce@redhat.com> <4F4B6AFE.6090601@redhat.com> <4F4B6D99.3090305@redhat.com> <4F4B8957.7060404@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Add blkmirror block driver List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Federico Simoncelli , mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 02/27/2012 03:59 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> > I guess what I'm saying is, if we need to copy-paste in order to fork >> > them in the future that's fine, but why maintain duplicates in the >> > mean-time? Please make the codebase nice today. We can always extend >> > it in the future, we're not forced to keep them unified forever if it >> > turns out we want to split them. But as it stands they are >> > essentially the same thing. > BTW, I feel that I may just be missing context on what the plans are > around mirroring and block migration. Is there a plan or discussions > that haven't hit qemu-devel (maybe they were done in ovirt or > internally)? Not that I know of. Me, I'm not on any oVirt list. :) Paolo