From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neal Kreitzinger Subject: Re: Push from specific directory. Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:09:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4F6BBF4F.9080302@gmail.com> References: <20120322225747.GB14874@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4F6BB425.2010807@gmail.com> <7vlimsur95.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff King , Anjib Mulepati To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 23 01:10:11 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SAs54-0006N6-K8 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:10:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760238Ab2CWAKF (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 20:10:05 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50752 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758440Ab2CWAKE (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 20:10:04 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SAs4w-0006FB-Sd for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:10:03 +0100 Received: from 67.63.162.200 ([67.63.162.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:10:02 +0100 Received: from nkreitzinger by 67.63.162.200 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:10:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.63.162.200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 In-Reply-To: <7vlimsur95.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 3/22/2012 6:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Neal Kreitzinger writes: > >> See this thread for the "cons" of nested git repos: (I don't think >> there are any "pros".) >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/190372 > > Hmph, I see you saying "I will keep this in mind" and "Thanks" at the end, > and back then I took it that you understood why/how nested working trees > are useful. Perhaps you didn't and I misunderstood you? I neglected to distinguish between ignored-nested-git-repos (has pros) and tracked-subdir-nested-git-repos (has no pros) in my preface to the thread link. That was an oversight on my part. BTW, I'm am still being compelled to deal with tracked-subdir-nested-git-repos and I have not found any pros to them so your original assessment of that technique still stands. ;-) v/r, neal