From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBp2X-0007RD-JE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:07:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBp2V-0004Z8-Td for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:07:29 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:48636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBp2V-0004Z2-Ov for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:07:27 -0400 Received: by obbwd20 with SMTP id wd20so4803719obb.4 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:07:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F6F34AC.2050707@codemonkey.ws> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:07:24 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120313145319.GD25451@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <20120322093244.GE22368@redhat.com> <4F6B5553.20601@codemonkey.ws> <20120322171445.GJ25451@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <4F6B850D.9000505@codemonkey.ws> <20120325094920.GJ22368@redhat.com> <4F6F15D2.8000504@codemonkey.ws> <4F6F18E4.2040905@redhat.com> <4F6F19AC.1080009@codemonkey.ws> <4F6F1A50.5090502@redhat.com> <20120325145842.GB11793@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120325145842.GB11793@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] Modern CPU models cannot be used with libvirt List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gleb Natapov Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Jiri Denemark , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity , Eduardo Habkost On 03/25/2012 09:58 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 03:14:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 03/25/2012 03:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>>> qemu -M pc >>>>> >>>>> Would effectively be short hand for -readconfig >>>>> /usr/share/qemu/machines/pc.cfg >>>> >>>> In that case >>>> >>>> qemu -cpu westmere >>>> >>>> is shorthand for -readconfig /usr/share/qemu/cpus/westmere.cfg. >>> >>> >>> This is not a bad suggestion, although it would make -cpu ? a bit >>> awkward. Do you see an advantage to this over having >>> /usr/share/qemu/target-x86_64-cpus.cfg that's read early on? >> >> Nope. As long as qemu -nodefconfig -cpu westmere works, I'm happy. >> > As log as qemu -nodefconfig -cpu westmere -M pc1.1 -nodefconfig is going to eventually mean that -cpu westmere and -M pc-1.1 will not work. This is where QEMU is going. There is no reason that a normal user should ever use -nodefconfig. Regards, Anthony Liguori