From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: removal of ia64 port Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:16:27 +0100 Message-ID: <4F79DEEB020000780007C0F3@nat28.tlf.novell.com> References: <20120323.155249.425911897.kuwa@jp.fujitsu.com> <4F6C49F7020000780007A763@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <1333012384.18810.45.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20120330.175445.321377065.kuwa@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120330.175445.321377065.kuwa@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Keir Fraser Cc: KUWAMURA Shin'ya , xen-ia64-devel@lists.xen.org, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 30.03.12 at 10:54, "KUWAMURA Shin'ya" wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:13:04 +0100 >>>>>> Ian.Campbell@citrix.com(Ian Campbell) said: >> >> Kuwamura, what is your motivation for wanting to keeping the ia64 port >> in 4.2 and beyond? > > As the result of my consideration, > I agree that ia64 port will be dropped on xen-unstable, since it seems > to be hardly needed: > - There was little discussion on xen-ia64-devel ML recently. > - There are few Xen ia64 developers. > - No new feature will be added. Keir, now that we apparently having reached consensus here, are you going to purge the ia64 bits from the tree, or do you want me to? Jan