From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> To: Michael Leun <lkml20120218@newton.leun.net> Cc: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com>, casteyde.christian@free.fr, Kelly Anderson <kelly@silka.with-linux.com>, "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>, linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] 3.3.1 ath9k regression Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:25:40 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4F7DE3A4.1040705@candelatech.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120404235104.682cfad3@xenia.leun.net> I see the regression on my WPEA-127N systems as well. With the patch applied to 3.3.1, I see never ending stream of auth timeouts (this log is watching 'iw event' output) power-management is OFF on my system, and using nohwcrypt, in case that matters. This is with 10 virtual stations. 2012-04-05 11:16:14.155 1.1: sta5 (phy #0): scan finished: 2412 2417 2422 2427 2432 2437 2442 2447 2452 2457 2462 2467 2472 5180 5200 5220 5240 5260 5280 5300 5320 5500 5520 5540 5560 5580 5600 5620 5640 5660 5680 5700 5745 5765 5785 5805 5825, "" 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta0 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta1 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta2 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta3 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta4 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta6 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta7 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta8 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta9 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta5 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:19.400 1.1: sta0 (phy #0): scan started 2012-04-05 11:16:23.302 1.1: sta0 (phy #0): scan finished: 2412 2417 2422 2427 2432 2437 2442 2447 2452 2457 2462 2467 2472 5180 5200 5220 5240 5260 5280 5300 5320 5500 5520 5540 5560 5580 5600 5620 5640 5660 5680 5700 5745 5765 5785 5805 5825, "" 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta1 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta2 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta3 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta4 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta5 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta6 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta7 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta8 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta9 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta0 (phy #0): auth: timed out I reverted the patch and then it associates immediately. Occasionally, I would see things associate and run OK with the patch in place, but it always took a lot of re-tries to associate even when it did work. I can easily test patches or try things if anyone has any ideas. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Subject: [ath9k-devel] 3.3.1 ath9k regression Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:25:40 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4F7DE3A4.1040705@candelatech.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120404235104.682cfad3@xenia.leun.net> I see the regression on my WPEA-127N systems as well. With the patch applied to 3.3.1, I see never ending stream of auth timeouts (this log is watching 'iw event' output) power-management is OFF on my system, and using nohwcrypt, in case that matters. This is with 10 virtual stations. 2012-04-05 11:16:14.155 1.1: sta5 (phy #0): scan finished: 2412 2417 2422 2427 2432 2437 2442 2447 2452 2457 2462 2467 2472 5180 5200 5220 5240 5260 5280 5300 5320 5500 5520 5540 5560 5580 5600 5620 5640 5660 5680 5700 5745 5765 5785 5805 5825, "" 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta0 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta1 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta2 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta3 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta4 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta6 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta7 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta8 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta9 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:15.266 1.1: sta5 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:19.400 1.1: sta0 (phy #0): scan started 2012-04-05 11:16:23.302 1.1: sta0 (phy #0): scan finished: 2412 2417 2422 2427 2432 2437 2442 2447 2452 2457 2462 2467 2472 5180 5200 5220 5240 5260 5280 5300 5320 5500 5520 5540 5560 5580 5600 5620 5640 5660 5680 5700 5745 5765 5785 5805 5825, "" 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta1 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta2 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta3 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta4 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta5 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta6 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta7 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta8 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta9 (phy #0): auth: timed out 2012-04-05 11:16:24.406 1.1: sta0 (phy #0): auth: timed out I reverted the patch and then it associates immediately. Occasionally, I would see things associate and run OK with the patch in place, but it always took a lot of re-tries to associate even when it did work. I can easily test patches or try things if anyone has any ideas. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-05 18:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-04-03 5:46 3.3.1 ath9k regression Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 6:01 ` Ben Greear 2012-04-03 6:01 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear 2012-04-03 6:26 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 6:26 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 6:49 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 6:49 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 7:16 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 7:16 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 7:46 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 7:46 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 7:52 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 7:52 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 8:04 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 8:04 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 8:38 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 8:38 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 18:03 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-03 18:03 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-04 7:29 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-04 7:29 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-04 15:03 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-04 15:03 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-04 21:51 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-04 21:51 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-05 6:16 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-05 6:16 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-05 13:53 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-05 13:53 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-05 18:25 ` Ben Greear [this message] 2012-04-05 18:25 ` Ben Greear 2012-04-06 5:11 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-06 5:11 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-06 20:31 ` Ben Greear 2012-04-06 20:31 ` Ben Greear 2012-04-08 23:08 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] 3.3.1 ath9k regression) Michael Leun 2012-04-08 23:08 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 6:28 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-09 6:28 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-09 8:45 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Sergio Correia 2012-04-09 8:45 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Sergio Correia 2012-04-09 10:25 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 10:25 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 14:03 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 14:03 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 14:22 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-09 14:22 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-09 15:29 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 15:29 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-10 5:48 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-10 5:48 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-10 5:55 ` Peter Stuge 2012-04-10 10:05 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-10 10:05 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-12 13:46 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau 2012-04-12 13:46 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Felix Fietkau 2012-04-12 13:58 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 13:58 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 15:35 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Michael Leun 2012-04-12 15:35 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-12 18:11 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau 2012-04-12 18:11 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Felix Fietkau 2012-04-12 19:28 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Sergio Correia 2012-04-12 19:28 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Sergio Correia 2012-04-14 21:15 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 21:15 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 22:01 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Michael Leun 2012-04-12 22:01 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 19:12 ` Sujith Manoharan 2012-04-09 19:12 ` Sujith Manoharan 2012-04-09 21:21 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-09 21:21 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-09 6:52 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.3.1 ath9k regression Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-09 6:52 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-04 10:40 ` Mantas M. [not found] <iM4WB-6k6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> [not found] ` <iM56i-6N7-11@gated-at.bofh.it> 2012-04-04 19:33 ` [ath9k-devel] " Martin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=4F7DE3A4.1040705@candelatech.com \ --to=greearb@candelatech.com \ --cc=ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \ --cc=casteyde.christian@free.fr \ --cc=kelly@silka.with-linux.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lkml20120218@newton.leun.net \ --cc=nbd@openwrt.org \ --cc=shafi.wireless@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.