From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from relay.parallels.com ([195.214.232.42]:50560 "EHLO relay.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760945Ab2DKTYy convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:24:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4F85DA84.8010703@parallels.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:24:52 +0400 From: Stanislav Kinsbursky MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. Bruce Fields" CC: Jeff Layton , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] nfsd/lockd: have locks_in_grace take a sb arg References: <20120410081612.65dd25fa@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <4F842BAE.2010804@parallels.com> <20120410093900.20209d00@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <4F84493C.1040303@parallels.com> <20120410144505.58bca0b9@corrin.poochiereds.net> <4F855864.8050509@parallels.com> <20120411074822.0054eb36@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <4F85825E.4060104@parallels.com> <20120411171919.GA29903@fieldses.org> <4F85C15D.5060408@parallels.com> <20120411182218.GB31025@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20120411182218.GB31025@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 11.04.2012 22:22, J. Bruce Fields написал: >> > What would happen, if we will have situation like below: >> > >> > mountd A mountd B >> > >> > pid_ns pid_ns >> > | | >> > mnt_ns mnt_ns >> > | | >> > ----- net_ns ---- >> > >> > Is it possible, BTW? >> > It yes, that is such construction valid? > Looks like a mess, no. I'd expect there to be only one rpc.mountd > running per network namespace. Then we have to prevent such situations somehow. Or it is done already?