From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933072Ab2DLLor (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:44:47 -0400 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([64.131.90.16]:33013 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932290Ab2DLLoq (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:44:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4F86BFC6.2050400@parallels.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:43:02 -0300 From: Glauber Costa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Weisbecker CC: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Hugh Dickins , Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , Daniel Walsh , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Li Zefan , LKML , Cgroups , Containers Subject: Re: [RFD] Merge task counter into memcg References: <20120411185715.GA4317@somewhere.redhat.com> <4F862851.3040208@jp.fujitsu.com> <20120412113217.GB11455@somewhere.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120412113217.GB11455@somewhere.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [187.35.198.137] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/12/2012 08:32 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >> But I think increasing number of subsystem is not very good.... > If the result is a better granularity on the overhead, I believe this > can be a good thing. But again, since there is quite number of people trying to merge those stuff together, you are just swimming against the tide. If this gets really integrated, out of a sudden the overhead will appear. So better care about it now. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [RFD] Merge task counter into memcg Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:43:02 -0300 Message-ID: <4F86BFC6.2050400@parallels.com> References: <20120411185715.GA4317@somewhere.redhat.com> <4F862851.3040208@jp.fujitsu.com> <20120412113217.GB11455@somewhere.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120412113217.GB11455-oHC15RC7JGTpAmv0O++HtFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Hugh Dickins , Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , Daniel Walsh , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Li Zefan , LKML , Cgroups , Containers On 04/12/2012 08:32 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >> But I think increasing number of subsystem is not very good.... > If the result is a better granularity on the overhead, I believe this > can be a good thing. But again, since there is quite number of people trying to merge those stuff together, you are just swimming against the tide. If this gets really integrated, out of a sudden the overhead will appear. So better care about it now.