From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:58967 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751757Ab2DOJTi (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Apr 2012 05:19:38 -0400 Received: by wejx9 with SMTP id x9so2755319wej.19 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F8A92A5.8090707@gmail.com> (sfid-20120415_112017_062083_C0856454) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:19:33 +0200 From: Xose Vazquez Perez MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Hartmann CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, IvDoorn@gmail.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, gwingerde@gmail.com, helmut.schaa@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH] wireless: rt2x00: rt2800usb add more devices ids References: <1334448592-16391-1-git-send-email-xose.vazquez@gmail.com> <4F8A6CB6.4080006@01019freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <4F8A6CB6.4080006@01019freenet.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/15/2012 08:37 AM, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Did you test them? What did you test exactly? What exactly works, what > does not? NO. NOTHING . I DON'T KNOW. But... > It doesn't mean anything, if they work with the legacy driver. ..., the chips in these devices are *identified* . They perform so well or so badly like those that are already in the driver(rt2800usb). > Linksys WUSB600Nv2 e.g. works fine with the legacy driver, but only > limited (if at all) with rt2800usb yet. config RT2800USB_RT35XX bool "rt2800usb - Include support for rt35xx devices ( *EXPERIMENTAL* )" depends on *EXPERIMENTAL*