On 24.04.2012 11:16, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 11:12:11 +0200, a écrit :
>> On 24.04.2012 11:00, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Tue 24 Apr 2012 10:55:21 +0200, a écrit :
>>>> On 24.04.2012 01:34, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>>>> +	  if (errno == ENOENT && part >= 5)
>>>>> +	    {
>>>> This introduces an assumption that if part >=5 is missing then there are
>>>> no additional partitions. While this is true for msdos, it's false for
>>>> GPT, where such config is common after deleting a partition. Moreover,
>>>> APM (apple) partitions often start at 8.
>>> Ok, but what do you suggest?  By the very nature of parted-based
>>> translators, there is no way to know how many partitions there are.
>> Can we know whether given device is partition? If we know that it is we
>> can iterate as long as we can, adding some restriction like your 1000
>> and issuing error if it's hit since it should never happen.
> I don't see how knowing whether the device is partition will help to
> know where to stop. A user could very well have all partition nodes in
> /dev up to 100, they'll all be partitions. Whether they actually exist
> is another story, but as you say, you can't assume anything with the
> absence of a partition.
Theoretically you shouldn't stop until you find the partition if you
know that your device is partition since it means that Hurd knows the
partition in question.
>
> Samuel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel


-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko