From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rework kvm_vcpu_on_spin Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:10:13 +0300 Message-ID: <4F9D2195.7070305@redhat.com> References: <4F96D34E.4010405@redhat.com> <1335360639-6004-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tossati , Carsten Otte , Alexander Graf , Jens Freimann , Cornelia Huck , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Heinz Graalfs , KVM To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10229 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752208Ab2D2LK3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:10:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1335360639-6004-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/25/2012 04:30 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Avi, > > what about this approach? > > Looks fine, and kvm_vcpu_on_spin() looks nicer as well. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function