From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 14:39:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500 In-Reply-To: <87mx5ot6vp.fsf@laptop.org> References: <1334325909-5779-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1334325909-5779-7-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <4F8BE5B0.4000900@linaro.org> <20120425185747.GC24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4FA29E46.6040204@linaro.org> <20120503151253.GE897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4FA2A4A8.9010208@linaro.org> <20120503163008.GF897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4FA2B4A3.2040402@linaro.org> <20120503164501.GG897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <8762cdur7o.fsf@laptop.org> <4FA3D720.7010004@linaro.org> <87mx5ot6vp.fsf@laptop.org> Message-ID: <4FA3DC27.6030204@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/05/12 14:26, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 04 2012, Lee Jones wrote: >> I can either do that, or push it through Arnd's tree if you like (and >> it's okay with him), as I will be supplying him with another pull >> request after my next patch-set has been scrutinised. Would that suit >> you better? > > If the MMC patches are self-contained and it doesn't break anything to > merge them separately, my preference is to merge them via the MMC tree > (to avoid creating conflicts against other MMC patches in there). > > If there are dependencies, going via Arnd instead is fine. Okay, I'll knock up a small patch-set and send it to you. I think it's 3 patches. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog