From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([88.190.12.23]:43795 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753058Ab2EKHyo (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2012 03:54:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4FACC5B1.80601@free-electrons.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 09:54:25 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Cameron CC: Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Ferre , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, thomas@free-electrons.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, patrice.vilchez@atmel.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards References: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <4FAB7D29.9000107@free-electrons.com> <4FAB815A.8040109@atmel.com> <201205101328.36524.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <201205101328.36524.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Hi Jonathan, Since everyone seems to have put his Acked-By (Nicolas, Arnd and you), are you ok to merge it in your tree ? You still had some minor comments, do you you want me to post a new patchset to the mailing list, or a public git branch would be enough ? Thanks, Maxime Le 10/05/2012 15:28, Arnd Bergmann a =E9crit : > On Thursday 10 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> So I would really like to keep the non-DT probing. This will give th= e >> ability for users to experiment IIO/ADC with whichever kernel revisi= on, >> whichever AT91 SoC they like. >> >> Arnd, we will have to agree on a way to push this work into mainline= , >> but please consider keeping the non-DT part for this driver. >=20 > Ok. If the non-DT part is important to you, I suggest you merge it > all through the IIO tree, to avoid dependency problems with the > platform data header file. >=20 > Please add my Acked-by for the arch/arm patches. >=20 > Arnd --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 09:54:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards In-Reply-To: <201205101328.36524.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <4FAB7D29.9000107@free-electrons.com> <4FAB815A.8040109@atmel.com> <201205101328.36524.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <4FACC5B1.80601@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Jonathan, Since everyone seems to have put his Acked-By (Nicolas, Arnd and you), are you ok to merge it in your tree ? You still had some minor comments, do you you want me to post a new patchset to the mailing list, or a public git branch would be enough ? Thanks, Maxime Le 10/05/2012 15:28, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit : > On Thursday 10 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> So I would really like to keep the non-DT probing. This will give the >> ability for users to experiment IIO/ADC with whichever kernel revision, >> whichever AT91 SoC they like. >> >> Arnd, we will have to agree on a way to push this work into mainline, >> but please consider keeping the non-DT part for this driver. > > Ok. If the non-DT part is important to you, I suggest you merge it > all through the IIO tree, to avoid dependency problems with the > platform data header file. > > Please add my Acked-by for the arch/arm patches. > > Arnd -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com