From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4FAD055F.3040404@cam.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:26:07 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxime Ripard CC: Jonathan Cameron , Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Ferre , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, thomas@free-electrons.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, patrice.vilchez@atmel.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards References: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <4FAB7D29.9000107@free-electrons.com> <4FAB815A.8040109@atmel.com> <201205101328.36524.arnd@arndb.de> <4FACC5B1.80601@free-electrons.com> In-Reply-To: <4FACC5B1.80601@free-electrons.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed List-ID: On 5/11/2012 8:54 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > Since everyone seems to have put his Acked-By (Nicolas, Arnd and you), > are you ok to merge it in your tree ? > > You still had some minor comments, do you you want me to post a new > patchset to the mailing list, or a public git branch would be enough ? IIO is still in staging from the point of view of git trees. Hence Greg will actually merge the patches. Could you send him a clean set with all the acks etc. (cc'd on this). > > Thanks, > Maxime > > Le 10/05/2012 15:28, Arnd Bergmann a =E9crit : >> On Thursday 10 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>> So I would really like to keep the non-DT probing. This will give the >>> ability for users to experiment IIO/ADC with whichever kernel revisio= n, >>> whichever AT91 SoC they like. >>> >>> Arnd, we will have to agree on a way to push this work into mainline, >>> but please consider keeping the non-DT part for this driver. >> >> Ok. If the non-DT part is important to you, I suggest you merge it >> all through the IIO tree, to avoid dependency problems with the >> platform data header file. >> >> Please add my Acked-by for the arch/arm patches. >> >> Arnd > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jic23@cam.ac.uk (Jonathan Cameron) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:26:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards In-Reply-To: <4FACC5B1.80601@free-electrons.com> References: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <4FAB7D29.9000107@free-electrons.com> <4FAB815A.8040109@atmel.com> <201205101328.36524.arnd@arndb.de> <4FACC5B1.80601@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <4FAD055F.3040404@cam.ac.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 5/11/2012 8:54 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > Since everyone seems to have put his Acked-By (Nicolas, Arnd and you), > are you ok to merge it in your tree ? > > You still had some minor comments, do you you want me to post a new > patchset to the mailing list, or a public git branch would be enough ? IIO is still in staging from the point of view of git trees. Hence Greg will actually merge the patches. Could you send him a clean set with all the acks etc. (cc'd on this). > > Thanks, > Maxime > > Le 10/05/2012 15:28, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit : >> On Thursday 10 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>> So I would really like to keep the non-DT probing. This will give the >>> ability for users to experiment IIO/ADC with whichever kernel revision, >>> whichever AT91 SoC they like. >>> >>> Arnd, we will have to agree on a way to push this work into mainline, >>> but please consider keeping the non-DT part for this driver. >> >> Ok. If the non-DT part is important to you, I suggest you merge it >> all through the IIO tree, to avoid dependency problems with the >> platform data header file. >> >> Please add my Acked-by for the arch/arm patches. >> >> Arnd > >