From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59575 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OuNMG-0006LT-Bi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 06:30:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuNMF-00056Z-89 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 06:30:56 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:42195 helo=mx1.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuNMF-00056K-2E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 06:30:55 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Alexander Graf In-Reply-To: <20100911071203.GA25515@laped.lan> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:30:50 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4FB0EF0C-E254-443F-B50D-057910A39202@suse.de> References: <1284167314-11594-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20100911071203.GA25515@laped.lan> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] PowerPC fixes List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Edgar E.Iglesias" Cc: Thomas Monjalon , QEMU Developers On 11.09.2010, at 09:12, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 03:08:32AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >> There goes another round of PowerPC fixes. Originally this should = only have >> been a fix for the MSR_POW issue (bug 608107), but I also stumbed = over recent >> Linux kernels not booting in qemu-system-ppc64. So a fix for that is = also >> included. >>=20 >> With this new logic I didn't really took care of all HV corner cases, = but HV >> mode is not properly implemented anyways (read: we should probably = rip it out >> or do it properly, whichever is easier). I'm also fairly sure that = the way >> things are now BookE doesn't work at all, so things again haven't = become worse. >>=20 >> Alexander Graf (2): >> PPC: Enable hint bits for lwarx/ldarx >> PPC: Redesign interrupt trigger path >=20 >=20 > FWIW the MSR parts look good to me. > Also, none of this seems to break anything on my Virtex5 PPC-440 BookE > board (Im working on cleaning that up so it eventually can be = submitted). You have a working 440 MMU implementation? FWIW on 440 (which is BookE) = the whole interrupt stuff works differently, giving two different = registers for status bits and saved MSR. Have you changed any bits = there? Alex