All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Oleksij Rempel (fishor)" <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Make _SxD/_SxW check follow ACPI 4.0a spec
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 08:03:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC0723D.7080208@fisher-privat.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205252200.24331.rjw@sisk.pl>

Hi,

On 25.05.2012 22:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, May 25, 2012, Alan Stern wrote:
>> Oleksij:
>>
>> Please take a look at this bug report:
>>
>> 	https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43278
>>
>> Apparently your patch breaks wakeup on this machine by preventing the
>> USB host controllers from being put into D3.
>
> I think the patch is incorrect, actually.
>
> First, if you look at the first hunk:
>
> -       if (acpi_target_sleep_state>  ACPI_STATE_S0)
> +       if (acpi_target_sleep_state>  ACPI_STATE_S0) {
> +               acpi_status status;
> +
>                  acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, acpi_method, NULL,&d_min);
>
> +               if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
> +                       acpi_method[3] = 'W';
> +                       status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, acpi_method,
> +                                                      NULL,&d_max);
> +                       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +                               d_max = d_min;
> +               }
> +       }
>
> it will do something like this: if the device is wakeup-capable, get d_max
> from _SxW, unless it fails.  However, the code just below in that function:
>
> 	if (acpi_target_sleep_state == ACPI_STATE_S0 ||
> 	    (device_may_wakeup(dev)&&
> 	adev->wakeup.sleep_state<= acpi_target_sleep_state)) {
> 		acpi_status status;
>
> 		acpi_method[3] = 'W';
> 		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, acpi_method, NULL,
> 						&d_max);
> 		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> 			if (acpi_target_sleep_state != ACPI_STATE_S0 ||
> 			    status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
> 				d_max = d_min;
> 		} else if (d_max<  d_min) {
> 			/* Warn the user of the broken DSDT */
> 			printk(KERN_WARNING "ACPI: Wrong value from %s\n",
> 				acpi_method);
> 			/* Sanitize it */
> 			d_min = d_max;
> 		}
> 	}
>
> does _exactly_ the same thing (it only has a more sophisticated error code path).

Not really correct. The code below check _SxW state on wake up. This 
code checks _SxW on suspend.

> It might check adev->wakeup.flags.valid instead of device_may_wakeup(dev),
> but that's a different story.
>
> So the only difference made by the patch is te hunk in pci_target_state().

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-26  6:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-29 20:44 [PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Make _SxD/_SxW check follow ACPI 4.0a spec Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-30 16:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-30 17:53   ` Alan Stern
2012-04-30 17:53     ` Alan Stern
2012-04-30 21:30     ` Oleksij Rempel
2012-04-30 21:43       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-01  6:38         ` Oleksij Rempel (fishor)
2012-05-01 14:04           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-01 14:04             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-01 14:11             ` Alan Stern
2012-05-01 14:11               ` Alan Stern
2012-05-01 16:27               ` Oleksij Rempel (fishor)
2012-05-01 16:59                 ` Alan Stern
2012-05-01 16:59                   ` Alan Stern
2012-05-02  4:10                   ` Oleksij Rempel (fishor)
2012-05-25 19:15                     ` Alan Stern
2012-05-25 20:00                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-26  6:03                         ` Oleksij Rempel (fishor) [this message]
2012-05-26  8:15                           ` Oleksij Rempel
2012-05-26 20:21                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-30 21:32     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-30 21:32       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-30 21:41   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-30 21:38     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-30 21:38       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-10 20:14     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-10 20:14       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-11  0:08 ` Greg KH
2012-07-11  9:07   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-11 13:53     ` Greg KH
2012-07-11 19:04       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-11 19:20         ` Greg KH
2012-07-11 19:29           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-12  4:30         ` Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC0723D.7080208@fisher-privat.net \
    --to=bug-track@fisher-privat.net \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.