Re: Some questions about Lttng

[Francis Giraldeau <francis.giraldeau@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2628 bytes --]

Le 2012-06-19 05:50, Zheng.Chang@emc.com a écrit :
>
> Hi folks,
>
>  
>
> I'm studying how to use Lttng now. I built a kernel which version is
> 2.6.38 and ran with lttng 2.0.
>
> I got some confused when I started to use it. Here are my questions:
>
>  
>
> 1. I didn't see kernel patches for kernel 3.x. Does it mean kernel 3.x
> support it already?
>

You don't need a kernel patch with lttng 2.0, only modules are required.
It uses the tracepoints already present in the kernel, and trace system
calls, and uses perf performance counters and kprobes.

> 2. I tried to do something like, dump the arguments of system call, or
> dump a backtrace in a specified function. But the output of lttng is
> very limited. Is there a way to do that with lttng?
>

If system calls are enabled, arguments are supposed to be dumped (option
--syscall to lttng enable-event). If it's not the case, then are you
sure you are using lttng 2.0 and not 0.12? ;) Because the older version
has a different behavior. One additional note: few system calls do not
have all their arguments decoded in lttng 2, but there are only a few.

> 3. I looked into some UST examples and found here are three header
> files:  tracepoint.h, tracepoint-event.h and ust-tracepoint-event.h.
> They have some duplicated macro definitions like TRACEPOINT_EVENT.
>

The macros are quite complicated. Some includes files are included more
than once to generate various portion of the tracepoint code. So, my
advice here is to take a working example and adapt it to your needs.

> And the examples includes all of these three header files despite no
> conflict here. Could someone help to explain the intention?
>
> 4. Once I defined a tracepoint in my code, seems some initializations
> would register default probe into the hook point.  How to disable the
> default probe and  register my self-defined probes?
>

You mean, call a custom function when tracepoint is executed? Maybe
somebody else has an answer, but AFAIK this is not possible. But you
could make a wrapper to your tracepoint and then call your additional
function there.

> 5. Does lttng-ust support dynamic traceing like kprobe?
>

AFAIK, the kernel tracer supports kprobe, but not UST. Maybe somebody
else can confirm/infirm the dynamic tracepoint feature in user-space?

You can use a feature of GCC to regiter callback on function entry and
exit, but since it executes for all functions, then the overhead is very
high. You can have a look here:

https://github.com/giraldeau/workload-kit/blob/master/ust/cyg.c

Cheers,

Francis

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6579 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #1.2: Signature cryptographique S/MIME --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4476 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev