From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/29] ARM: omap: clk: use clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:06:06 +0530 Message-ID: <4FE2B2C6.4010904@ti.com> References: <1339678038-23082-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1339678038-23082-5-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <20120614191147.GP19410@gmail.com> <4FDAC07A.7020702@ti.com> <20120620114149.GG12766@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.71]:41317 "EHLO na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755216Ab2FUFgP (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:36:15 -0400 Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so800826obb.27 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:36:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120620114149.GG12766@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Mike Turquette , paul@pwsan.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 20 June 2012 05:11 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Rajendra Nayak [120614 22:01]: >> On Friday 15 June 2012 12:41 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: >>> On 20120614-18:16, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >>>> As we move to Common clk framework use clk_prepare_enable() >>>> instead of clk_enable() and similarly clk_disable_unprepare() >>>> instead of clk_disable() >>>> >>>> Based on initial changes from Mike turquette. > > Sounds like these kind of patches should be a separate series > to prepare for the common clk fwk conversion? It seems these > could already get merged separately? yes, I will post them out separately as a preparatory series for CCF conversion. I also have some to get rid of the omap_clk_get_by_name() usage and direct dereferencing of 'struct clk'. Paul, are you ok to look at them as preparatory patches for CCF conversion too? > > Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:06:06 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 04/29] ARM: omap: clk: use clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare In-Reply-To: <20120620114149.GG12766@atomide.com> References: <1339678038-23082-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1339678038-23082-5-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <20120614191147.GP19410@gmail.com> <4FDAC07A.7020702@ti.com> <20120620114149.GG12766@atomide.com> Message-ID: <4FE2B2C6.4010904@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 20 June 2012 05:11 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Rajendra Nayak [120614 22:01]: >> On Friday 15 June 2012 12:41 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: >>> On 20120614-18:16, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >>>> As we move to Common clk framework use clk_prepare_enable() >>>> instead of clk_enable() and similarly clk_disable_unprepare() >>>> instead of clk_disable() >>>> >>>> Based on initial changes from Mike turquette. > > Sounds like these kind of patches should be a separate series > to prepare for the common clk fwk conversion? It seems these > could already get merged separately? yes, I will post them out separately as a preparatory series for CCF conversion. I also have some to get rid of the omap_clk_get_by_name() usage and direct dereferencing of 'struct clk'. Paul, are you ok to look at them as preparatory patches for CCF conversion too? > > Tony