All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: enable unaligned access on ARMv7
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:56:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEA21F5.4080803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120622111501.21e1fdcc@aari01-12>

On 06/22/2012 04:15 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
> 
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:06:20 +0200, Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de> wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2012, 12:42 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
>>> On 06/05/2012 11:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
>>>> Recent toolchains default to using the hardware feature for
>>>> unaligned access on ARM v7, rather than doing the software
>>>> fallback. According to ARM this is safe as all v7 implementations
>>>> have to support this feature.
>>>> (http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0471c/BABJFFAE.html)
>>>>
>>>> To avoid CPU hangs when doing unaligned memory access, we have to
>>>> turn off alignment checking in our CPU initialisation code.
>>>> (http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0491c/CIHCGCFD.html)
>>>
>>> Does this behavior change trickle down to Linux/... too, or would
>>> an OS completely re-initialize this state, and hence not be
>>> affected?
>>>
>>
>> Linux in particular does reinitialize this state and I expect any
>> reasonable OS to do so.
> 
> Then what is the point of enabling it on U-Boot? Does it fix some issue
> whereby some mis-aligned piece of data cannot be properly aligned?
> 

This is a new optimization feature in gcc 4.7 (and backported to some
4.6 versions like the ubuntu 12.04 arm cross compiler (4.6.3)):

http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2012-June/012360.html

http://seabright.co.nz/2012/06/11/kernel-not-booting-with-linaro-gcc/

If you don't want to enable unaligned accesses, then
"-mno-unaligned-access" needs to be added.

Regards,
Rob

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-26 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-05 17:47 [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: enable unaligned access on ARMv7 Lucas Stach
2012-06-05 18:42 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-05 19:06   ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-22  9:15     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-06-22  9:36       ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-22 11:16         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-06-22 11:47           ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-22 22:11             ` Aneesh V
2012-06-22 22:13               ` Aneesh V
2012-06-23  9:01                 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-06-23 17:43                   ` V, Aneesh
2012-06-25 20:34                     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-06-25 21:49                       ` Aneesh V
2012-06-25 22:02                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-06-23 19:50                   ` Måns Rullgård
2012-06-24  6:30                   ` Lucas Stach
     [not found]                     ` <20120625221741.3a32790e@lilith>
2012-06-25 21:34                       ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-26 20:56       ` Rob Herring [this message]
2012-06-27 10:14         ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-02  9:42           ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: armv7: add compile option -mno-unaligned-access if available Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-02  9:53             ` Måns Rullgård
2012-07-02 15:16               ` Lucas Stach
2012-07-02 16:14                 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-07-03  7:10                   ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-05  7:57                   ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-18 21:37                     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-19  4:31                     ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-19  4:29                   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-19  6:28                     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-19 14:27                       ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-20  7:12                         ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-12 15:12             ` Gary Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FEA21F5.4080803@gmail.com \
    --to=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.