From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Priebe Subject: Re: OSD Hardware questions Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:00:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4FEC7FA4.3010307@profihost.ag> References: <4FEB04CC.4050008@profihost.ag> <4FEB10DA.7010206@inktank.com> <4FEB2310.9080801@profihost.ag> <4FEB26A7.4070507@profihost.ag> <4FEB2E07.6010402@inktank.com> <4FEC5A4E.1090209@profihost.ag> <4FEC6C68.2030307@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.profihost.ag ([85.158.179.208]:49254 "EHLO mail.profihost.ag" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754050Ab2F1QAi (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:00:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FEC6C68.2030307@inktank.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Nelson Cc: Gregory Farnum , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Am 28.06.2012 16:38, schrieb Mark Nelson: > On 06/28/2012 08:21 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: >> While doing sequential writes i see pretty low CPU usage. Random writes >> is the problem. >> >> Stefan > > It would be interesting to see where all your CPU time is being spent. Correct - what do you need? > What benchmark are you using to do the random writes? in KVM VM: export DISK=/dev/vda fio --filename=$DISK --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=200G --numjobs=50 --runtime=90 --group_reporting --name=file1 Stefan