From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52713) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlKL6-0003Xl-M0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 09:37:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlKL5-0003LP-1b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 09:37:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:45735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlKL4-0003L9-OO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 09:37:22 -0400 Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so1960133wib.10 for ; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 06:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4FF0528E.6000307@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 15:37:18 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] build: introduce target CONFIG_ variables and use them for kvm List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori Il 23/06/2012 12:30, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> > Can't it go in hw/arm/kvm (mimicking the final desired place, which >> > will be target-arm/hw/kvm)? And hw/kvm can be moved to hw/i386/kvm, or >> > we can leave it there for now until we're ready to move it to >> > target-i386/hw/kvm. > Why's the final desired place target-arm/hw/kvm ? That doesn't > make much sense to me... Doesn't it have some dependency on target-arm/kvm.c? Paolo