From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Branchaud Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Teach remote.c about the remote.default configuration setting. Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:57:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4FF7433F.606@xiplink.com> References: <1341526277-17055-1-git-send-email-marcnarc@xiplink.com> <1341526277-17055-3-git-send-email-marcnarc@xiplink.com> <7v4nplrfe4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4FF6F805.20403@xiplink.com> <7vhatkofe6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jens.Lehmann@web.de, peff@peff.net, phil.hord@gmail.com To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 06 21:58:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SnEfK-00053L-Ut for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:58:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751720Ab2GFT54 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 15:57:56 -0400 Received: from smtp146.ord.emailsrvr.com ([173.203.6.146]:43609 "EHLO smtp146.ord.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751646Ab2GFT5n (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 15:57:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp23.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 262E91C8096; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 15:57:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp23.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: mbranchaud-AT-xiplink.com) with ESMTPSA id A16341C80B7; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 15:57:42 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 In-Reply-To: <7vhatkofe6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 12-07-06 03:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Marc Branchaud writes: > >> On 12-07-05 06:50 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> >>>> - effective_remote_name is the name of the remote tracked by the current >>>> branch, or is default_remote_name if the current branch doesn't have a >>>> remote. >>> >>> The explanation of the latter belongs to the previous step, I think. >>> I am not sure if "effective" is the best name for the concept the >>> above explains, though. >> >> Well, the previous commit removes default_remote_name, so the explanation >> wouldn't be valid verbatim. > > The previous one introduces "effective" (which I still think is not > the best word for the semantics you are trying to give to the > variable) I'm open to suggestions. M.