From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1, WEIRD_PORT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB0CC433DB for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618A564EDB for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230095AbhBZIE3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 03:04:29 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:13091 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229845AbhBZIET (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 03:04:19 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Dn2Dd0bxfz16Csk; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:01:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.178.147] (10.174.178.147) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:03:20 +0800 Subject: Re: 5.10 LTS Kernel: 2 or 6 years? To: Nikolai Kondrashov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Scott Branden CC: Huxinwei , LKML , Yanjin , BCM Kernel Feedback , Zhaohongjiang , "Zhangdianfang (Dianfang, OS Lab)" , PEIXIN HOU , Linux ARM , , Wei Yongjun , Lijinyue References: <595affb4-36e8-0a63-ebb3-a4fd0e3c243a@huawei.com> <2a7ff382-1d35-0eeb-6fb6-bad37aa4c1d7@redhat.com> From: Hanjun Guo Message-ID: <4abea94d-5232-19ab-3139-569e485403b3@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:03:19 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2a7ff382-1d35-0eeb-6fb6-bad37aa4c1d7@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.147] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Nick, Sorry for taking so long to reply you, we had discussions on how to corporate with KCIDB, please see my comments inline. On 2021/2/19 22:45, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > Hi Hanjun, > > On 2/19/21 10:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > In specific, we will start from the testing work, using HULK robot > > (reports lots of bugs to mainline kernel) testing framework to test > > compile, reboot, functional testing, and will extend to basic > > performance regression testing in the future. > > I heard about Huawei ramping up kernel testing from someone at FOSDEM > 2019. I wonder if it was you :) Nice to see your progress and the company > stepping up to help with testing! I Cced Yongjun and Jinyue, they are the key persons :) > > Would you be interested in working with the Linux Foundation KernelCI > project > on submitting your build and test results to the common database - KCIDB? Yes, we are willing to sent the test results to KCIDB. For now, all the tests are inside the company, which blocks us to directly sent the test results out of the test machine due to the security policy, it takes us sometime to discuss how to send out the test results, and we may need do the test in a public cloud. > > We are working on aggregating results from various testing systems so we > can > provide a dashboard, and a single, aggregated e-mail report to subscribed > maintainers and developers. > > We have a prototype dashboard at https://staging.kernelci.org:3000/ and are > working hard on making the e-mail reports good enough to start reaching > out to > maintainers. > > We already have ARM, Google Syzbot, Gentoo GKernelCI, Red Hat CKI, and, of > course, KernelCI native tests sending data to the database. Linaro > Tuxsuite is > starting sending today. We could use your data, and of course any > development > help you could spare :) How can we connect to the KCIDB? Can we send the test data out by email first? > > I wish I could show you my today's KCIDB presentation at DevConf.cz, but > the > recording is not out yet. Meanwhile you can take a look at our > presentation at > last year's Linux Plumbers: https://youtu.be/y9Glc90WUN0?t=10739 > > Or see our intro in an older blog post: > https://foundation.kernelci.org/blog/2020/08/21/introducing-common-reporting/ > > > Anyone wishing to contribute to KCIDB gets credentials and permissions to > submit to our "playground" setup where they can send their data, see it > in a > dashboard, experiment without worrying about breaking anything, and > decide if > they like it or n > > If you're interested, take a look at our Submission HOWTO: > https://github.com/kernelci/kcidb/blob/v8/SUBMISSION_HOWTO.md > and send an email to kernelci@groups.io (CC'd), or come over to the > #kernelci > channel on freenode.net! Thanks! Hanjun From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1,WEIRD_PORT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DFDC4332B for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10C2E64EDB for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:05:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 10C2E64EDB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ekUJhh99+5h1CtFrOzGgbu9xDpMy/IaFwXsGGuZitdc=; b=ztAkCJXcMqhJDUQr3Oi9jBYGo xa4GkPSgyWAnP2fUOwLwiaf8r7Jac4D8FwXWHWFkjKEgJm52K6+urZC7H/LsNieSRAxR4+s4BZDbU cB3FM97t4D2YrJwKyUKkPnswtzYW7p0gLvAaq0dN86rYkq/+FtpDnheppuuMk2SrqjADk+6oB0IF8 7xrfHe5hjaoJkPgCOCFoMfNvFGDVpYD1GLs8+bUUvQIE9NE3xI2xzl2S8jX90Q+pniwFr/AVpa3LC ezXKBhaHO4HLkQ408pJ8nt/qaHWuhY/RHqvmqTZQru5/05CoWJ81azykMvlPjqiVlADI2ZhaT0eB1 E+EqjcMKQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lFY6F-0003R0-VL; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:03:47 +0000 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lFY6B-0003OW-C9 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:03:45 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Dn2Dd0bxfz16Csk; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:01:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.178.147] (10.174.178.147) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:03:20 +0800 Subject: Re: 5.10 LTS Kernel: 2 or 6 years? To: Nikolai Kondrashov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Scott Branden References: <595affb4-36e8-0a63-ebb3-a4fd0e3c243a@huawei.com> <2a7ff382-1d35-0eeb-6fb6-bad37aa4c1d7@redhat.com> From: Hanjun Guo Message-ID: <4abea94d-5232-19ab-3139-569e485403b3@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:03:19 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2a7ff382-1d35-0eeb-6fb6-bad37aa4c1d7@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-GB X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.147] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210226_030344_871261_60942BA4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.46 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Yanjin , LKML , kernelci@groups.io, Huxinwei , BCM Kernel Feedback , Zhaohongjiang , "Zhangdianfang \(Dianfang, OS Lab\)" , Wei Yongjun , Lijinyue , PEIXIN HOU , Linux ARM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Nick, Sorry for taking so long to reply you, we had discussions on how to corporate with KCIDB, please see my comments inline. On 2021/2/19 22:45, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > Hi Hanjun, > > On 2/19/21 10:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > In specific, we will start from the testing work, using HULK robot > > (reports lots of bugs to mainline kernel) testing framework to test > > compile, reboot, functional testing, and will extend to basic > > performance regression testing in the future. > > I heard about Huawei ramping up kernel testing from someone at FOSDEM > 2019. I wonder if it was you :) Nice to see your progress and the company > stepping up to help with testing! I Cced Yongjun and Jinyue, they are the key persons :) > > Would you be interested in working with the Linux Foundation KernelCI > project > on submitting your build and test results to the common database - KCIDB? Yes, we are willing to sent the test results to KCIDB. For now, all the tests are inside the company, which blocks us to directly sent the test results out of the test machine due to the security policy, it takes us sometime to discuss how to send out the test results, and we may need do the test in a public cloud. > > We are working on aggregating results from various testing systems so we > can > provide a dashboard, and a single, aggregated e-mail report to subscribed > maintainers and developers. > > We have a prototype dashboard at https://staging.kernelci.org:3000/ and are > working hard on making the e-mail reports good enough to start reaching > out to > maintainers. > > We already have ARM, Google Syzbot, Gentoo GKernelCI, Red Hat CKI, and, of > course, KernelCI native tests sending data to the database. Linaro > Tuxsuite is > starting sending today. We could use your data, and of course any > development > help you could spare :) How can we connect to the KCIDB? Can we send the test data out by email first? > > I wish I could show you my today's KCIDB presentation at DevConf.cz, but > the > recording is not out yet. Meanwhile you can take a look at our > presentation at > last year's Linux Plumbers: https://youtu.be/y9Glc90WUN0?t=10739 > > Or see our intro in an older blog post: > https://foundation.kernelci.org/blog/2020/08/21/introducing-common-reporting/ > > > Anyone wishing to contribute to KCIDB gets credentials and permissions to > submit to our "playground" setup where they can send their data, see it > in a > dashboard, experiment without worrying about breaking anything, and > decide if > they like it or n > > If you're interested, take a look at our Submission HOWTO: > https://github.com/kernelci/kcidb/blob/v8/SUBMISSION_HOWTO.md > and send an email to kernelci@groups.io (CC'd), or come over to the > #kernelci > channel on freenode.net! Thanks! Hanjun _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: 5.10 LTS Kernel: 2 or 6 years? References: <595affb4-36e8-0a63-ebb3-a4fd0e3c243a@huawei.com> <2a7ff382-1d35-0eeb-6fb6-bad37aa4c1d7@redhat.com> From: Hanjun Guo Message-ID: <4abea94d-5232-19ab-3139-569e485403b3@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:03:19 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2a7ff382-1d35-0eeb-6fb6-bad37aa4c1d7@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: To: Nikolai Kondrashov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Scott Branden Cc: Huxinwei , LKML , Yanjin , BCM Kernel Feedback , Zhaohongjiang , "Zhangdianfang (Dianfang, OS Lab)" , PEIXIN HOU , Linux ARM , kernelci@groups.io, Wei Yongjun , Lijinyue Hi Nick, Sorry for taking so long to reply you, we had discussions on how to corporate with KCIDB, please see my comments inline. On 2021/2/19 22:45, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > Hi Hanjun, > > On 2/19/21 10:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > In specific, we will start from the testing work, using HULK robot > > (reports lots of bugs to mainline kernel) testing framework to test > > compile, reboot, functional testing, and will extend to basic > > performance regression testing in the future. > > I heard about Huawei ramping up kernel testing from someone at FOSDEM > 2019. I wonder if it was you :) Nice to see your progress and the company > stepping up to help with testing! I Cced Yongjun and Jinyue, they are the key persons :) > > Would you be interested in working with the Linux Foundation KernelCI > project > on submitting your build and test results to the common database - KCIDB? Yes, we are willing to sent the test results to KCIDB. For now, all the tests are inside the company, which blocks us to directly sent the test results out of the test machine due to the security policy, it takes us sometime to discuss how to send out the test results, and we may need do the test in a public cloud. > > We are working on aggregating results from various testing systems so we > can > provide a dashboard, and a single, aggregated e-mail report to subscribed > maintainers and developers. > > We have a prototype dashboard at https://staging.kernelci.org:3000/ and are > working hard on making the e-mail reports good enough to start reaching > out to > maintainers. > > We already have ARM, Google Syzbot, Gentoo GKernelCI, Red Hat CKI, and, of > course, KernelCI native tests sending data to the database. Linaro > Tuxsuite is > starting sending today. We could use your data, and of course any > development > help you could spare :) How can we connect to the KCIDB? Can we send the test data out by email first? > > I wish I could show you my today's KCIDB presentation at DevConf.cz, but > the > recording is not out yet. Meanwhile you can take a look at our > presentation at > last year's Linux Plumbers: https://youtu.be/y9Glc90WUN0?t=10739 > > Or see our intro in an older blog post: > https://foundation.kernelci.org/blog/2020/08/21/introducing-common-reporting/ > > > Anyone wishing to contribute to KCIDB gets credentials and permissions to > submit to our "playground" setup where they can send their data, see it > in a > dashboard, experiment without worrying about breaking anything, and > decide if > they like it or n > > If you're interested, take a look at our Submission HOWTO: > https://github.com/kernelci/kcidb/blob/v8/SUBMISSION_HOWTO.md > and send an email to kernelci@groups.io (CC'd), or come over to the > #kernelci > channel on freenode.net! Thanks! Hanjun