From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9369CC282CE for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 11:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402DC2173C for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 11:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dkim.kinghost.net header.i=@dkim.kinghost.net header.b="WS4Aw5qS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728450AbfEVLn1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 07:43:27 -0400 Received: from smtpi-sp-232.kinghost.net ([177.185.201.232]:41857 "EHLO smtpi-sp-232.kinghost.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727464AbfEVLn1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 07:43:27 -0400 Received: from t460s.bristot.redhat.com (unknown [193.205.81.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: daniel@bristot.eti.br) by smtpi-sp-232.kinghost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A430F6000E0D; Wed, 22 May 2019 08:43:09 -0300 (-03) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dkim.kinghost.net; i=@dkim.kinghost.net; q=dns/txt; s=king1; t=1558525398; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : from : date; bh=qrvuM7U5KpjfU4CVTUL6ca1r25zCJ2bQmhyDzV0bWtA=; b=WS4Aw5qSBt6bAEvV51Yj2LUoG5trgC1uQpPqNsfRaC+I9Pk/sfy/AyeD nppQpDCuKfWCk/1tm/Rsm3gPCEAY1VQHamofRudcfJCzeWfFLSbTRMCBGU VHFmwd3cyUM1KwcLipK3OEL+8/MIXq31pAGvpZiildS1/dDKrZBhmYneY= Subject: Re: Real-time micro-conference proposal for Linux Plumbers 2019 To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, dhaval.giani@oracle.com, Frederic Weisbecker References: <5ef34142-2b55-28ff-612d-0ec7b0c521d1@redhat.com> <20190522010523.GO8945@kernel.org> From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Message-ID: <4d4b57cf-5672-1052-5e19-2eaf57bf8092@bristot.me> Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 13:43:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190522010523.GO8945@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SND-ID: E3DhL4HZvWApxdeEu0+R3k19tF2vhIUMcvigv4x0qidpkEMv/61pVU+Ic2kX C2E5z/9xJ4WEtUyKW/eV3FZ7zvScFxePFa14LSue53pHuZl1ipaxjYVtTiUr FyOksIttuLh95wvMzlGVK7dvaDbGlgjyKeVVfnUBcw8D6/MIjsv68ARNUk/7 S/UCLTfRosni2Fs2/YcqBOjeqHfowfrBy+OZ7uMuQWCCSprAdID06URyumoP 1rQUZTS/FkWjFitr92Ed+S2FdIFVCVRNqKbLMeBe/mvYhrkgPvEB5kTEe4VB fnb+0ZtaAzkVAHXUItmphNVae0vuPNJeAUuHLr8D/tWMKaW3a99p4VqwDvmQ M5Dm20U+5PiJciR1hL0tOhwknhe2sZzxx1Jh9uodfTs7NsNSsLI2NAYVr1Zo VtXlqwlh2N6oLYc3bZlk4ntQyGUejbahPezHmEumDAyyR1b50kau9PUS+ZIv cqD66zOzKoDxtE4Ziy+ijsMdtRqQgc4MbWBGNknDTTsTlViUb5glCOfQK8BY y6pXpLUSmNzpi6w= Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org On 5/22/19 3:05 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, May 21, 2019 at 03:07:54PM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira escreveu: >> >> >> On 5/3/19 8:53 AM, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: >>> Hi all! >>> >> >> Hi all! >> >> Good news from OSPM! >> >> I just talked to Frederic Weisbecker, and he is proposing talking about the >> softirq rework that we need - as a step to the -rt merge! >> >> Dhaval Giani is also mentioning the possibility of talking about their needs >> w.r.t proxy execution! >> >> Anyone else with a good idea? stable-rt people??? :-) > > Has anyone thought about how BPF interacts with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL? I've heard that there are some preempt_disable sections around BPF code, right? That is interesting too! (as people are more and more prone to use BPF to do _put a complex thing here_). -- Daniel