From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C0BC64E7A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 15:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE3BB20857 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 15:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="CAU0rA1u" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BE3BB20857 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:60730 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk7og-0003pj-2b for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:43:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk7ng-0003Io-QS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:42:44 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:44480) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk7nb-0002ag-Fx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:42:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606837358; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/1ryuTR31lHpA8WYDkF0absAkwcZH1cY0GkEVAo4FmQ=; b=CAU0rA1urJGCMSyXcz/z7nM17g/eSbMzirvTMAGrhhCb+0h983CF47uoRGhiFI9IMJYrk4 z3npas5l2ijLL51asWtj2Qjvo9kM+ECUo8WuPrqTIKFWhELbA6j+YlsWCqKCc060f6zprN hR8HZMQIgJcJHvTWfGYjBYrjhiXBRDI= Received: from mail-ej1-f71.google.com (mail-ej1-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-553-aFHGRfnwNpentZ-MUBZmug-1; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:42:37 -0500 X-MC-Unique: aFHGRfnwNpentZ-MUBZmug-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f71.google.com with SMTP id f2so1425775ejx.22 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 07:42:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/1ryuTR31lHpA8WYDkF0absAkwcZH1cY0GkEVAo4FmQ=; b=a7G9a/Vzgvc1AjGvnU19JumKKX/6X8jtTjVDLwTU+Pm6ZkuKgr36D3HFl4Ouk2f4L3 Fs2+VxtVZ7lsCz6JHEdBVy0C8x+on8mpwm6ERdd0XxoFSVlUjgAeoKgUls6HTbiTp9rw AhH7DC1f4GyHsZmLOBiUNn0LUjSB064o1QBUBsW+SRHgV5K+dz5tXlVlMTSuYVEnBSxT b3W0U2XkginfHWpx1KPvszxe0m+bqo3eXnX0SOcWVvAgW8mHoeS5Vf07WsSYMJM/0BL1 ahHajz7rAfPECccVKsKMZy9iLlW/m0aPQfxquKtVba/V2IAHuKiJBm0EGJ78Y6xmBk6X IoWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Sh9Pn9nH1DqBU4gmARKI5UwB7pgvxQKcoAXxN15WkQbP/CfNd loncD+pqC7CAS9oQa51TS5hTdnxMUXcXCm1CqRKAzIBhiQxEwW44M941DuVe6yQrKb4NqeKA9lP T4VgGCcR3Ff5QBMW9ydy/tYEAGNmdP/ATefRmM63tt46TKOSIO9k12yqKeHNXq1+0WRk= X-Received: by 2002:a50:b761:: with SMTP id g88mr3589630ede.387.1606837355757; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 07:42:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFim6yXmcPByGeJ7P8wrKTVuUTaXtUK2koNXTT/MMlJZLye8XY+Y0Nmbmwvt/h9KhknzBYMQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:b761:: with SMTP id g88mr3589608ede.387.1606837355558; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 07:42:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gf9sm78305ejb.18.2020.12.01.07.42.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 07:42:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end To: Peter Maydell , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= References: <20201118142745.112579-1-ppandit@redhat.com> <204751s9-11np-413q-q3pr-3o6os86078@erqung.pbz> <492170b8-8056-bd65-5150-62c6e89cb3f0@redhat.com> <933np1s-8p4p-o74p-rp94-517r98nop2o6@erqung.pbz> <0fd8daa2-7ce3-0231-8b95-d498ce900c8e@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4e376269-5ef8-5560-dac1-734ccdddd419@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 16:42:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -35 X-Spam_score: -3.6 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.497, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: John Snow , Wenxiang Qian , Michael Tokarev , QEMU Developers , P J P Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 01/12/20 16:30, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 15:28, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> About reproducer, Michael asked about CVE-2020-24352 (ati_vga OOB in >> ati_2d_blt) this morning. What happens to reproducers when a CVE is >> assigned, but the bug is marked as "out of the QEMU security boundary"? > > Also, why are we assigning CVEs for bugs we don't consider security bugs? Sometimes CVEs are requested by other entities even before reaching the QEMU security mailing list. Paolo