From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Don't complete in IRQ, use llist_head
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 21:27:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e703284-2f75-6030-f697-aa2d362c3949@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210123201027.3262800-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On 1/23/21 1:10 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Patch 2+3 were applied and then dropped by Jens due to a NOHZ+softirq
> related warning [0]. Turns out a successful wakeup via
> set_nr_if_polling() will not process any softirqs and the CPU may go
> back to idle. This is addressed by patch #1.
>
> smpcfd_dying_cpu() will also invoke SMP-functions calls via
> flush_smp_call_function_queue() but the block layer shouldn't queue
> anything because the CPU isn't online anymore.
> The two caller of flush_smp_call_function_from_idle() look fine with
> opening interrupts from within do_softirq().
>
> [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1ee4b31b-350e-a9f5-4349-cfb34b89829a@kernel.dk
I can queue up the block side once the IPI fix is in some stable branch
that I can pull in.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-25 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-23 20:10 [PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Don't complete in IRQ, use llist_head Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] smp: Process pending softirqs in flush_smp_call_function_from_idle() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-01 19:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-09 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-09 11:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-10 13:53 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-17 13:17 ` tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: Always complete remote completions requests in softirq Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 7:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-01-25 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 8:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 9:29 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 8:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-27 11:22 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-01-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Use llist_head for blk_cpu_done Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 8:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 8:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 8:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25 9:54 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25 10:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-27 11:23 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-01-25 4:27 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-02-10 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Don't complete in IRQ, use llist_head Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e703284-2f75-6030-f697-aa2d362c3949@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.