From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] PM / ACPI / i2c: Deploy runtime PM centric path for system sleep Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:10:10 +0300 Message-ID: <4f22e64f-8a3c-9ce2-d12d-d3ff2c4108c9@linux.intel.com> References: <1503499329-28834-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:10094 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755829AbdHYOKR (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:10:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1503499329-28834-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Ulf Hansson , Wolfram Sang , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kevin Hilman , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Jisheng Zhang , John Stultz , Guodong Xu , Sumit Semwal , Haojian Zhuang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 08/23/2017 05:42 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > This series has been tested on an ARM64 Hikey board, which isn't having the > i2c device attached to the ACPI PM domain. This means that the ACPI changes > needs to be tested on some relevant Intel SoCs and it's greatly appreciated > is someone could help out with this, so is of course review comments. > I tested this set on both platforms using drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c and drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c and didn't see any issues. I guess tested-by is not needed yet as details are cooking in ACPI part of the set. -- Jarkko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Nikula) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:10:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] PM / ACPI / i2c: Deploy runtime PM centric path for system sleep In-Reply-To: <1503499329-28834-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> References: <1503499329-28834-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Message-ID: <4f22e64f-8a3c-9ce2-d12d-d3ff2c4108c9@linux.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/23/2017 05:42 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > This series has been tested on an ARM64 Hikey board, which isn't having the > i2c device attached to the ACPI PM domain. This means that the ACPI changes > needs to be tested on some relevant Intel SoCs and it's greatly appreciated > is someone could help out with this, so is of course review comments. > I tested this set on both platforms using drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c and drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c and didn't see any issues. I guess tested-by is not needed yet as details are cooking in ACPI part of the set. -- Jarkko