From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752829AbdK0Pv5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:51:57 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:41000 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752652AbdK0Pvy (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:51:54 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: introduce MAP_FIXED_SAFE To: Michal Hocko , linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: Michael Ellerman , Andrew Morton , Russell King - ARM Linux , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Abdul Haleem , Joel Stanley , Kees Cook References: <20171116101900.13621-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20171116121438.6vegs4wiahod3byl@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171124085405.dwln5k3dk7fdio7e@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Khalid Aziz Organization: Oracle Corp Message-ID: <4f5eb24c-5af2-eebf-d54f-875f4b259793@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:51:10 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171124085405.dwln5k3dk7fdio7e@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/24/2017 01:54 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > Are there any more concerns? So far the biggest one was the name. The > other which suggests a flag as a modifier has been sorted out hopefully. > Is there anymore more before we can consider this for merging? Well > except for man page update which I will prepare of course. Can we target > this to 4.16? I do not have concerns with this approach. I prefer a new flag as opposed to a modifier and the name is ok by me. Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Khalid Aziz Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: introduce MAP_FIXED_SAFE Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:51:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4f5eb24c-5af2-eebf-d54f-875f4b259793@oracle.com> References: <20171116101900.13621-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20171116121438.6vegs4wiahod3byl@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171124085405.dwln5k3dk7fdio7e@dhcp22.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171124085405.dwln5k3dk7fdio7e@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Language: en-US Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Michal Hocko , linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: Michael Ellerman , Andrew Morton , Russell King - ARM Linux , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Abdul Haleem , Joel Stanley , Kees Cook List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 11/24/2017 01:54 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > Are there any more concerns? So far the biggest one was the name. The > other which suggests a flag as a modifier has been sorted out hopefully. > Is there anymore more before we can consider this for merging? Well > except for man page update which I will prepare of course. Can we target > this to 4.16? I do not have concerns with this approach. I prefer a new flag as opposed to a modifier and the name is ok by me. Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org