All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Git mailing list <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] coccicheck: process every source file at once
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 13:36:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f705fbc-e1a3-8e27-02ed-39a5c3dcfdcc@drbeat.li> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+P7+xoqKG84n5EMKbajuZoXrOKZMudZ6CT-OKzz8XYyTYaCWQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 02.10.18 22:18, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:07 PM Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
>>
>> make coccicheck is used in order to apply coccinelle semantic patches,
>> and see if any of the transformations found within contrib/coccinelle/
>> can be applied to the current code base.
>>
>> Pass every file to a single invocation of spatch, instead of running
>> spatch once per source file.
>>
>> This reduces the time required to run make coccicheck by a significant
>> amount of time:
>>
>> Prior timing of make coccicheck
>>   real    6m14.090s
>>   user    25m2.606s
>>   sys     1m22.919s
>>
>> New timing of make coccicheck
>>   real    1m36.580s
>>   user    7m55.933s
>>   sys     0m18.219s
>>
>> This is nearly a 4x decrease in the time required to run make
>> coccicheck. This is due to the overhead of restarting spatch for every
>> file. By processing all files at once, we can amortize this startup cost
>> across the total number of files, rather than paying it once per file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
>> ---
> 
> Forgot to add what changed. I dropped the subshell and "||" bit around
> invoking spatch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jake
> 
> 
>>  Makefile | 6 ++----
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> index df1df9db78da..da692ece9e12 100644
>> --- a/Makefile
>> +++ b/Makefile
>> @@ -2715,10 +2715,8 @@ endif
>>  %.cocci.patch: %.cocci $(COCCI_SOURCES)
>>         @echo '    ' SPATCH $<; \
>>         ret=0; \
>> -       for f in $(COCCI_SOURCES); do \
>> -               $(SPATCH) --sp-file $< $$f $(SPATCH_FLAGS) || \
>> -                       { ret=$$?; break; }; \
>> -       done >$@+ 2>$@.log; \
>> +       $(SPATCH) --sp-file $< $(COCCI_SOURCES) $(SPATCH_FLAGS) >$@+ 2>$@.log; \
>> +       ret=$$?; \
>>         if test $$ret != 0; \
>>         then \
>>                 cat $@.log; \
>> --
>> 2.18.0.219.gaf81d287a9da
>>

Wouldn't the following be even simpler?

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 5c8307b7c479..a37b2724d526 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -2701,12 +2701,7 @@ endif

 %.cocci.patch: %.cocci $(COCCI_SOURCES)
        @echo '    ' SPATCH $<; \
-       ret=0; \
-       for f in $(COCCI_SOURCES); do \
-               $(SPATCH) --sp-file $< $$f $(SPATCH_FLAGS) || \
-                       { ret=$$?; break; }; \
-       done >$@+ 2>$@.log; \
-       if test $$ret != 0; \
+       if ! $(SPATCH) --sp-file $< $(COCCI_SOURCES) $(SPATCH_FLAGS)
>$@+ 2>$@.log; \
        then \
                cat $@.log; \
                exit 1; \

Cheers,
Beat


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-07 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-02 20:07 [PATCH v3] coccicheck: process every source file at once Jacob Keller
2018-10-02 20:18 ` Jacob Keller
2018-10-05  2:17   ` Jacob Keller
2018-10-05 12:40     ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-10-05 16:25       ` Jeff King
2018-10-05 16:53         ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-10-05 16:59           ` Jeff King
2018-10-05 18:50             ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-10-05 19:00               ` Jeff King
2018-10-05 23:10                 ` Jacob Keller
2018-10-06  8:42                 ` René Scharfe
2018-10-09  3:11                   ` Jeff King
2018-10-05 18:39         ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-10-05 19:02           ` Jeff King
2018-10-05 19:54             ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-10-09  3:15               ` Jeff King
2018-10-10 11:44                 ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-10-10 13:59                   ` Jeff King
2018-10-07 11:36   ` Beat Bolli [this message]
2018-10-07 11:49     ` Beat Bolli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f705fbc-e1a3-8e27-02ed-39a5c3dcfdcc@drbeat.li \
    --to=dev+git@drbeat.li \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.