All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
To: "guangming.cao@mediatek.com" <guangming.cao@mediatek.com>,
	"sumit.semwal@linaro.org" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com" <mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com>,
	"wsd_upstream@mediatek.com" <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
	"yf.wang@mediatek.com" <yf.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"libo.kang@mediatek.com" <libo.kang@mediatek.com>,
	"benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org" <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
	"bo.song@mediatek.com" <bo.song@mediatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"lmark@codeaurora.org" <lmark@codeaurora.org>,
	"labbott@redhat.com" <labbott@redhat.com>,
	"christian.koenig@amd.com" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com" <jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:57:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f88205c1b344aea8608960e2f85b8f4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113123406.11520-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com>


>-----Original Message-----
>From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>guangming.cao@mediatek.com
>Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 7:34 AM
>To: sumit.semwal@linaro.org
>Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com;
>Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>;
>wsd_upstream@mediatek.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; dri-
>devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org;
>yf.wang@mediatek.com; libo.kang@mediatek.com;
>benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org; bo.song@mediatek.com;
>matthias.bgg@gmail.com; linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org;
>lmark@codeaurora.org; labbott@redhat.com; christian.koenig@amd.com;
>jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com; linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation
>
>From: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>
>Add a size check for allocation since the allocation size is
>always less than the total DRAM size.
>
>Without this check, once the invalid size allocation runs on a process that
>can't be killed by OOM flow(such as "gralloc" on Android devices), it will
>cause a kernel exception, and to make matters worse, we can't find who are
>using
>so many memory with "dma_buf_debug_show" since the relevant dma-buf
>hasn't exported.
>
>To make OOM issue easier, maybe need dma-buf framework to dump the
>buffer size
>under allocating in "dma_buf_debug_show".
>
>Signed-off-by: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>Signed-off-by: jianjiao zeng <jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com>
>---
>v3: 1. update patch, use right shift to replace division.
>    2. update patch, add reason in code and commit message.
>v2: 1. update size limitation as total_dram page size.
>    2. update commit message
>---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>index 56bf5ad01ad5..1fd382712584 100644
>--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>@@ -55,6 +55,16 @@ static int dma_heap_buffer_alloc(struct dma_heap
>*heap, size_t len,
> 	struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> 	int fd;
>
>+	/*
>+	 * Invalid size check. The "len" should be less than totalram.
>+	 *
>+	 * Without this check, once the invalid size allocation runs on a process
>that
>+	 * can't be killed by OOM flow(such as "gralloc" on Android devices), it
>will
>+	 * cause a kernel exception, and to make matters worse, we can't find
>who are using
>+	 * so many memory with "dma_buf_debug_show" since the relevant
>dma-buf hasn't exported.
>+	 */
>+	if (len >> PAGE_SHIFT > totalram_pages())

If your "heap" is from cma, is this still a valid check?

M

>+		return -EINVAL;
> 	/*
> 	 * Allocations from all heaps have to begin
> 	 * and end on page boundaries.
>--
>2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
To: "guangming.cao@mediatek.com" <guangming.cao@mediatek.com>,
	"sumit.semwal@linaro.org" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com" <jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com>,
	"lmark@codeaurora.org" <lmark@codeaurora.org>,
	"wsd_upstream@mediatek.com" <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	"christian.koenig@amd.com" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"yf.wang@mediatek.com" <yf.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"libo.kang@mediatek.com" <libo.kang@mediatek.com>,
	"benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org" <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
	"bo.song@mediatek.com" <bo.song@mediatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"labbott@redhat.com" <labbott@redhat.com>,
	"mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com" <mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:57:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f88205c1b344aea8608960e2f85b8f4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113123406.11520-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com>


>-----Original Message-----
>From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>guangming.cao@mediatek.com
>Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 7:34 AM
>To: sumit.semwal@linaro.org
>Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com;
>Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>;
>wsd_upstream@mediatek.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; dri-
>devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org;
>yf.wang@mediatek.com; libo.kang@mediatek.com;
>benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org; bo.song@mediatek.com;
>matthias.bgg@gmail.com; linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org;
>lmark@codeaurora.org; labbott@redhat.com; christian.koenig@amd.com;
>jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com; linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation
>
>From: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>
>Add a size check for allocation since the allocation size is
>always less than the total DRAM size.
>
>Without this check, once the invalid size allocation runs on a process that
>can't be killed by OOM flow(such as "gralloc" on Android devices), it will
>cause a kernel exception, and to make matters worse, we can't find who are
>using
>so many memory with "dma_buf_debug_show" since the relevant dma-buf
>hasn't exported.
>
>To make OOM issue easier, maybe need dma-buf framework to dump the
>buffer size
>under allocating in "dma_buf_debug_show".
>
>Signed-off-by: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>Signed-off-by: jianjiao zeng <jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com>
>---
>v3: 1. update patch, use right shift to replace division.
>    2. update patch, add reason in code and commit message.
>v2: 1. update size limitation as total_dram page size.
>    2. update commit message
>---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>index 56bf5ad01ad5..1fd382712584 100644
>--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>@@ -55,6 +55,16 @@ static int dma_heap_buffer_alloc(struct dma_heap
>*heap, size_t len,
> 	struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> 	int fd;
>
>+	/*
>+	 * Invalid size check. The "len" should be less than totalram.
>+	 *
>+	 * Without this check, once the invalid size allocation runs on a process
>that
>+	 * can't be killed by OOM flow(such as "gralloc" on Android devices), it
>will
>+	 * cause a kernel exception, and to make matters worse, we can't find
>who are using
>+	 * so many memory with "dma_buf_debug_show" since the relevant
>dma-buf hasn't exported.
>+	 */
>+	if (len >> PAGE_SHIFT > totalram_pages())

If your "heap" is from cma, is this still a valid check?

M

>+		return -EINVAL;
> 	/*
> 	 * Allocations from all heaps have to begin
> 	 * and end on page boundaries.
>--
>2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
To: "guangming.cao@mediatek.com" <guangming.cao@mediatek.com>,
	"sumit.semwal@linaro.org" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com" <mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com>,
	"wsd_upstream@mediatek.com" <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
	"yf.wang@mediatek.com" <yf.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"libo.kang@mediatek.com" <libo.kang@mediatek.com>,
	"benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org" <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
	"bo.song@mediatek.com" <bo.song@mediatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"lmark@codeaurora.org" <lmark@codeaurora.org>,
	"labbott@redhat.com" <labbott@redhat.com>,
	"christian.koenig@amd.com" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com" <jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:57:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f88205c1b344aea8608960e2f85b8f4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113123406.11520-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com>


>-----Original Message-----
>From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>guangming.cao@mediatek.com
>Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 7:34 AM
>To: sumit.semwal@linaro.org
>Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com;
>Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>;
>wsd_upstream@mediatek.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; dri-
>devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org;
>yf.wang@mediatek.com; libo.kang@mediatek.com;
>benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org; bo.song@mediatek.com;
>matthias.bgg@gmail.com; linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org;
>lmark@codeaurora.org; labbott@redhat.com; christian.koenig@amd.com;
>jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com; linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation
>
>From: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>
>Add a size check for allocation since the allocation size is
>always less than the total DRAM size.
>
>Without this check, once the invalid size allocation runs on a process that
>can't be killed by OOM flow(such as "gralloc" on Android devices), it will
>cause a kernel exception, and to make matters worse, we can't find who are
>using
>so many memory with "dma_buf_debug_show" since the relevant dma-buf
>hasn't exported.
>
>To make OOM issue easier, maybe need dma-buf framework to dump the
>buffer size
>under allocating in "dma_buf_debug_show".
>
>Signed-off-by: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>Signed-off-by: jianjiao zeng <jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com>
>---
>v3: 1. update patch, use right shift to replace division.
>    2. update patch, add reason in code and commit message.
>v2: 1. update size limitation as total_dram page size.
>    2. update commit message
>---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>index 56bf5ad01ad5..1fd382712584 100644
>--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>@@ -55,6 +55,16 @@ static int dma_heap_buffer_alloc(struct dma_heap
>*heap, size_t len,
> 	struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> 	int fd;
>
>+	/*
>+	 * Invalid size check. The "len" should be less than totalram.
>+	 *
>+	 * Without this check, once the invalid size allocation runs on a process
>that
>+	 * can't be killed by OOM flow(such as "gralloc" on Android devices), it
>will
>+	 * cause a kernel exception, and to make matters worse, we can't find
>who are using
>+	 * so many memory with "dma_buf_debug_show" since the relevant
>dma-buf hasn't exported.
>+	 */
>+	if (len >> PAGE_SHIFT > totalram_pages())

If your "heap" is from cma, is this still a valid check?

M

>+		return -EINVAL;
> 	/*
> 	 * Allocations from all heaps have to begin
> 	 * and end on page boundaries.
>--
>2.17.1


_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
To: "guangming.cao@mediatek.com" <guangming.cao@mediatek.com>,
	"sumit.semwal@linaro.org" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com" <mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com>,
	"wsd_upstream@mediatek.com" <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
	"yf.wang@mediatek.com" <yf.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"libo.kang@mediatek.com" <libo.kang@mediatek.com>,
	"benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org" <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
	"bo.song@mediatek.com" <bo.song@mediatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"lmark@codeaurora.org" <lmark@codeaurora.org>,
	"labbott@redhat.com" <labbott@redhat.com>,
	"christian.koenig@amd.com" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com" <jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:57:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f88205c1b344aea8608960e2f85b8f4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113123406.11520-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com>


>-----Original Message-----
>From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>guangming.cao@mediatek.com
>Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 7:34 AM
>To: sumit.semwal@linaro.org
>Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com;
>Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>;
>wsd_upstream@mediatek.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; dri-
>devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org;
>yf.wang@mediatek.com; libo.kang@mediatek.com;
>benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org; bo.song@mediatek.com;
>matthias.bgg@gmail.com; linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org;
>lmark@codeaurora.org; labbott@redhat.com; christian.koenig@amd.com;
>jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com; linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation
>
>From: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>
>Add a size check for allocation since the allocation size is
>always less than the total DRAM size.
>
>Without this check, once the invalid size allocation runs on a process that
>can't be killed by OOM flow(such as "gralloc" on Android devices), it will
>cause a kernel exception, and to make matters worse, we can't find who are
>using
>so many memory with "dma_buf_debug_show" since the relevant dma-buf
>hasn't exported.
>
>To make OOM issue easier, maybe need dma-buf framework to dump the
>buffer size
>under allocating in "dma_buf_debug_show".
>
>Signed-off-by: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>Signed-off-by: jianjiao zeng <jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com>
>---
>v3: 1. update patch, use right shift to replace division.
>    2. update patch, add reason in code and commit message.
>v2: 1. update size limitation as total_dram page size.
>    2. update commit message
>---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>index 56bf5ad01ad5..1fd382712584 100644
>--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>@@ -55,6 +55,16 @@ static int dma_heap_buffer_alloc(struct dma_heap
>*heap, size_t len,
> 	struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> 	int fd;
>
>+	/*
>+	 * Invalid size check. The "len" should be less than totalram.
>+	 *
>+	 * Without this check, once the invalid size allocation runs on a process
>that
>+	 * can't be killed by OOM flow(such as "gralloc" on Android devices), it
>will
>+	 * cause a kernel exception, and to make matters worse, we can't find
>who are using
>+	 * so many memory with "dma_buf_debug_show" since the relevant
>dma-buf hasn't exported.
>+	 */
>+	if (len >> PAGE_SHIFT > totalram_pages())

If your "heap" is from cma, is this still a valid check?

M

>+		return -EINVAL;
> 	/*
> 	 * Allocations from all heaps have to begin
> 	 * and end on page boundaries.
>--
>2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-17  9:41 [PATCH] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size limitation for allocation guangming.cao
2021-12-17  9:41 ` guangming.cao
2021-12-17  9:41 ` guangming.cao
2021-12-17  9:41 ` guangming.cao
2021-12-27  9:51 ` [PATCH v2] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check " guangming.cao
2021-12-27  9:51   ` guangming.cao
2021-12-27  9:51   ` guangming.cao
2021-12-27  9:51   ` guangming.cao
2022-01-03 18:57   ` John Stultz
2022-01-03 18:57     ` John Stultz
2022-01-03 18:57     ` John Stultz
2022-01-03 18:57     ` John Stultz
2022-01-04  7:47     ` Christian König
2022-01-04  7:47       ` Christian König
2022-01-04  7:47       ` Christian König
2022-01-04  7:47       ` Christian König
2022-01-04  8:44       ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-04  8:44         ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-04  8:44         ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-05  6:36       ` guangming.cao
2022-01-05  6:36         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-05  6:36         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-05  6:36         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-13 10:50         ` Sumit Semwal
2022-01-13 10:50           ` Sumit Semwal
2022-01-13 10:50           ` Sumit Semwal
2022-01-13 10:50           ` Sumit Semwal
2022-01-13 12:34           ` [PATCH v3] " guangming.cao
2022-01-13 12:34             ` guangming.cao
2022-01-13 12:34             ` guangming.cao
2022-01-13 12:34             ` guangming.cao
2022-01-13 12:57             ` Ruhl, Michael J [this message]
2022-01-13 12:57               ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 12:57               ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 12:57               ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:00               ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:00                 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:00                 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:00                 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:05                 ` Christian König
2022-01-13 13:05                   ` Christian König
2022-01-13 13:05                   ` Christian König
2022-01-13 13:05                   ` Christian König
2022-01-13 23:26                   ` John Stultz
2022-01-13 23:26                     ` John Stultz
2022-01-13 23:26                     ` John Stultz
2022-01-13 23:26                     ` John Stultz
2022-01-14  7:16                     ` Christian König
2022-01-14  7:16                       ` Christian König
2022-01-14  7:16                       ` Christian König
2022-01-14  7:16                       ` Christian König
2022-01-14 12:05                       ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-14 12:05                         ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-14 12:05                         ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-15  1:17                         ` John Stultz
2022-01-15  1:17                           ` John Stultz
2022-01-15  1:17                           ` John Stultz
2022-01-15  1:17                           ` John Stultz
2022-01-19  9:59                           ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-19  9:59                             ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-19  9:59                             ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-19 20:37                             ` John Stultz
2022-01-19 20:37                               ` John Stultz
2022-01-19 20:37                               ` John Stultz
2022-01-19 20:37                               ` John Stultz
2022-01-20  3:34                               ` [PATCH v4] dma-buf: system_heap: " guangming.cao
2022-01-20  3:34                                 ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  3:34                                 ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  3:34                                 ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  3:48                                 ` John Stultz
2022-01-20  3:48                                   ` John Stultz
2022-01-20  3:48                                   ` John Stultz
2022-01-20  3:48                                   ` John Stultz
2022-01-20  7:08                                   ` [PATCH v5] " guangming.cao
2022-01-20  7:08                                     ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  7:08                                     ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  7:08                                     ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  8:27                                     ` Christian König
2022-01-20  8:27                                       ` Christian König
2022-01-20  8:27                                       ` Christian König
2022-01-20  8:27                                       ` Christian König
2022-01-20  8:52                                       ` [PATCH v6] " guangming.cao
2022-01-20  8:52                                         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  8:52                                         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  8:52                                         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:00                                         ` [PATCH v6 RESEND] " guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:00                                           ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:00                                           ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:00                                           ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:22                                           ` Christian König
2022-01-20 10:22                                             ` Christian König
2022-01-20 10:22                                             ` Christian König
2022-01-20 10:22                                             ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f88205c1b344aea8608960e2f85b8f4@intel.com \
    --to=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=bo.song@mediatek.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=guangming.cao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=libo.kang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lmark@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yf.wang@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.