All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"  <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:09:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f9effcb-055b-51ee-6722-c9f0cc1d8acf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b885c52-f70a-147e-86bd-c71a8f4ef564@amd.com>



On 8/10/21 12:48 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 8/10/21 1:45 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/27/21 3:26 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> index de01903c3735..cafed6456d45 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>>    #include <linux/start_kernel.h>
>>>    #include <linux/io.h>
>>>    #include <linux/memblock.h>
>>> -#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>>    #include <linux/pgtable.h>
>>>      #include <asm/processor.h>
>>> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ unsigned long __head __startup_64(unsigned long
>>> physaddr,
>>>         * there is no need to zero it after changing the memory encryption
>>>         * attribute.
>>>         */
>>> -    if (mem_encrypt_active()) {
>>> +    if (prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
>>>            vaddr = (unsigned long)__start_bss_decrypted;
>>>            vaddr_end = (unsigned long)__end_bss_decrypted;
>>
>>
>> Since this change is specific to AMD, can you replace PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT with
>> prot_guest_has(PATTR_SME) || prot_guest_has(PATTR_SEV). It is not used in
>> TDX.
> 
> This is a direct replacement for now. I think the change you're requesting
> should be done as part of the TDX support patches so it's clear why it is
> being changed.

Ok. I will include it part of TDX changes.

> 
> But, wouldn't TDX still need to do something with this shared/unencrypted
> area, though? Or since it is shared, there's actually nothing you need to
> do (the bss decrpyted section exists even if CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT is not
> configured)?

Kirill had a requirement to turn on CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT for adding lazy
accept support in TDX guest kernel. Kirill, can you add details here?

> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
>>

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:09:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f9effcb-055b-51ee-6722-c9f0cc1d8acf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b885c52-f70a-147e-86bd-c71a8f4ef564@amd.com>



On 8/10/21 12:48 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 8/10/21 1:45 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/27/21 3:26 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> index de01903c3735..cafed6456d45 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>>    #include <linux/start_kernel.h>
>>>    #include <linux/io.h>
>>>    #include <linux/memblock.h>
>>> -#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>>    #include <linux/pgtable.h>
>>>      #include <asm/processor.h>
>>> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ unsigned long __head __startup_64(unsigned long
>>> physaddr,
>>>         * there is no need to zero it after changing the memory encryption
>>>         * attribute.
>>>         */
>>> -    if (mem_encrypt_active()) {
>>> +    if (prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
>>>            vaddr = (unsigned long)__start_bss_decrypted;
>>>            vaddr_end = (unsigned long)__end_bss_decrypted;
>>
>>
>> Since this change is specific to AMD, can you replace PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT with
>> prot_guest_has(PATTR_SME) || prot_guest_has(PATTR_SEV). It is not used in
>> TDX.
> 
> This is a direct replacement for now. I think the change you're requesting
> should be done as part of the TDX support patches so it's clear why it is
> being changed.

Ok. I will include it part of TDX changes.

> 
> But, wouldn't TDX still need to do something with this shared/unencrypted
> area, though? Or since it is shared, there's actually nothing you need to
> do (the bss decrpyted section exists even if CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT is not
> configured)?

Kirill had a requirement to turn on CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT for adding lazy
accept support in TDX guest kernel. Kirill, can you add details here?

> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
>>

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:09:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f9effcb-055b-51ee-6722-c9f0cc1d8acf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b885c52-f70a-147e-86bd-c71a8f4ef564@amd.com>



On 8/10/21 12:48 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 8/10/21 1:45 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/27/21 3:26 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> index de01903c3735..cafed6456d45 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>>    #include <linux/start_kernel.h>
>>>    #include <linux/io.h>
>>>    #include <linux/memblock.h>
>>> -#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>>    #include <linux/pgtable.h>
>>>      #include <asm/processor.h>
>>> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ unsigned long __head __startup_64(unsigned long
>>> physaddr,
>>>         * there is no need to zero it after changing the memory encryption
>>>         * attribute.
>>>         */
>>> -    if (mem_encrypt_active()) {
>>> +    if (prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
>>>            vaddr = (unsigned long)__start_bss_decrypted;
>>>            vaddr_end = (unsigned long)__end_bss_decrypted;
>>
>>
>> Since this change is specific to AMD, can you replace PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT with
>> prot_guest_has(PATTR_SME) || prot_guest_has(PATTR_SEV). It is not used in
>> TDX.
> 
> This is a direct replacement for now. I think the change you're requesting
> should be done as part of the TDX support patches so it's clear why it is
> being changed.

Ok. I will include it part of TDX changes.

> 
> But, wouldn't TDX still need to do something with this shared/unencrypted
> area, though? Or since it is shared, there's actually nothing you need to
> do (the bss decrpyted section exists even if CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT is not
> configured)?

Kirill had a requirement to turn on CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT for adding lazy
accept support in TDX guest kernel. Kirill, can you add details here?

> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
>>

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:09:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f9effcb-055b-51ee-6722-c9f0cc1d8acf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b885c52-f70a-147e-86bd-c71a8f4ef564@amd.com>



On 8/10/21 12:48 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 8/10/21 1:45 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/27/21 3:26 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> index de01903c3735..cafed6456d45 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>>    #include <linux/start_kernel.h>
>>>    #include <linux/io.h>
>>>    #include <linux/memblock.h>
>>> -#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>>> +#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
>>>    #include <linux/pgtable.h>
>>>      #include <asm/processor.h>
>>> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ unsigned long __head __startup_64(unsigned long
>>> physaddr,
>>>         * there is no need to zero it after changing the memory encryption
>>>         * attribute.
>>>         */
>>> -    if (mem_encrypt_active()) {
>>> +    if (prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
>>>            vaddr = (unsigned long)__start_bss_decrypted;
>>>            vaddr_end = (unsigned long)__end_bss_decrypted;
>>
>>
>> Since this change is specific to AMD, can you replace PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT with
>> prot_guest_has(PATTR_SME) || prot_guest_has(PATTR_SEV). It is not used in
>> TDX.
> 
> This is a direct replacement for now. I think the change you're requesting
> should be done as part of the TDX support patches so it's clear why it is
> being changed.

Ok. I will include it part of TDX changes.

> 
> But, wouldn't TDX still need to do something with this shared/unencrypted
> area, though? Or since it is shared, there's actually nothing you need to
> do (the bss decrpyted section exists even if CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT is not
> configured)?

Kirill had a requirement to turn on CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT for adding lazy
accept support in TDX guest kernel. Kirill, can you add details here?

> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
>>

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-10 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 214+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-27 22:26 [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 13:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 16:28     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-28 16:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-02 10:34   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:34     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:34     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:34     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-11 14:53   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 14:53     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 15:39     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:39       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:39       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:39       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-11 15:39       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 13:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 13:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-29 14:24     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-29 14:24       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-29 14:24       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-29 14:24       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-29 14:24       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:35   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:35     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:35     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:35     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:37   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:37     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:37     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:37     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:42   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:42     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:42     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:42     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:45   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:45     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:45     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:45     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-09 21:59     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:59       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:59       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:59       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 21:59       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:08       ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08         ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08         ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08         ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:08         ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-30 22:34   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-30 22:34     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-30 22:34     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-30 22:34     ` Sean Christopherson via iommu
2021-07-30 22:34     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-09 21:55     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:55       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:55       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 21:55       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 21:55       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 12:42   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-02 12:42     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-09 22:04     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:04       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:04       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:04       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 22:04       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 18:45   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 18:45     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 19:48     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 19:48       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 19:48       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 19:48       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-10 19:48       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 20:09       ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2021-08-10 20:09         ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 20:09         ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 20:09         ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 20:09         ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 12:19       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 12:19         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 15:52         ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:52           ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:52           ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-11 15:52           ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-11 15:52           ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-12 10:07           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-12 10:07             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-13 17:08             ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:08               ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:08               ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:08               ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 17:08               ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17               ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17                 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17                 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 20:17                 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 20:17                 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:47   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:47     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:47     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:47     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/sev: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:46   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:46     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:46     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-02 10:46     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 11/11] s390/mm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-07-27 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50   ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50   ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50   ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50   ` Christian König
2021-07-28 11:50   ` Christian König
2021-08-09  1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09  1:41   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09  1:41   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09  1:41   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09  1:41   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:16   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:16     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:16     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:16     ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-09 22:16     ` Tom Lendacky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f9effcb-055b-51ee-6722-c9f0cc1d8acf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.