On 6/14/21 5:52 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 17:10, Alexandre Iooss <erdnaxe@crans.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is a Cortex-M3 based machine. Information can be found at:
>> https://www.st.com/en/evaluation-tools/stm32vldiscovery.html
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Iooss <erdnaxe@crans.org>
> 
> The commit message says this is Cortex-M3 based, but the
> code gives it a Cortex-M4. Which is correct?

This is an typo. The board is Cortex-M3 so I will fix the machine code 
in next version of this patchset.

>> ---
>>   MAINTAINERS                             |  6 +++
>>   default-configs/devices/arm-softmmu.mak |  1 +
>>   hw/arm/Kconfig                          |  4 ++
>>   hw/arm/meson.build                      |  1 +
>>   hw/arm/stm32vldiscovery.c               | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   5 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 hw/arm/stm32vldiscovery.c
> 
> Could you add some documentation for the new board, please?
> This lives in docs/system/arm. Commit c9f8511ea8d2b807 gives
> an example of adding docs for a board.
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 

Should I rather:
1. Add `docs/system/arm/stm32vldiscovery.rst` to document only this new 
machine?
2. Add `docs/system/arm/stm32discovery.rst` to document this new machine 
and future STM32 Discovery boards?
3. Add `docs/system/arm/stm32.rst` to document all STM32-based boards?

STM32 boards share a lot in common so I believe option 3 is more 
appropriate, what is your opinion?
If we go with option 3, I can also try to document the Netduino Plus 2 
(maybe in another commit, or another patchset later).

Thanks,
-- Alexandre